Skip to main content
iRubric: Ch. 22 Texas Penal Code News Article Review rubric

iRubric: Ch. 22 Texas Penal Code News Article Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ch. 22 Texas Penal Code News Article Review 
Newspaper Article Review
Rubric Code: CXC5654
By jessbrisc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Newspaper Article Review
  Good

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Missing/Unacceptable

0 pts

Article Selection

Good

- The source was a reliable website or newspaper/magazine website.

-URL link must be listed under title and in proper format.

- The author (if no author news site) and date of the article were cited.
- The article was up-to-date, within the time-frame specified in assignment description.
Fair

- The source was a reliable website or newspaper/magazine website.

- The information appeared to be recent, however, the date and/or author were not cited with in the paper.

- URL website was included but not in proper format.
Poor

- The validity of the source was questionable.

- The date and author was not given.


- No URL
Missing/Unacceptable

- There was no source cited within the review.

- Topic was inappropriate for this assignment.

- No URL
Format & Writing Mechanics

Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

-Includes intro, body and conclusion

-Size 12 font; typed

- Double-spaced

-Exceeds one page
Fair

- For the most part, rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

- Language is clear and precise.

-Size 12 font; typed

-Double-spaced

-At least one page but does not exceed one page
Poor

- Review contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

- Language lacks clarity or includes use of some jargon or conversational tone.

- No size 12 font; typed

- Not double spaced

- Less than one page
Missing/Unacceptable

- Review contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.

- Does not meet any requirements stated previously
Article Summary

Good

- The summary exceeded the stated requirements.

- All relevant information was listed and elaborated upon.

- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Fair

- The summary met all the stated requirements.

- Major points are addressed and are well supported.

- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Poor

- The summary recalled some information, but left out several important points.

- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Missing/Unacceptable

- The summary was inadequate and too brief.

- Most of the information was left out or incomplete.

- Points are unclear.
Opinion & Critical Evaluation

Good

- Opinion is fully supported by facts.

- Review demonstrates outstanding level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.

- Evidence is well identified and evaluated by using elements of crime and justification
Fair

- Opinion on topic has some support.

- Review demonstrates a good level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.

- Evidence is identified and evaluated by using most of elements of crime for justification.
Poor

- Opinion has no support.

- Review demonstrates a fair level of critical evaluation and thinking about the evidence presented in the article.

-Evidence is either not identified or evaluated by using some elements of crime for justification.
Missing/Unacceptable

- Opinion is not stated.

- Review demonstrates a poor level of critical evaluation and thinking about evidence presented in the article.

- Evidence not identified or evaluated.
Personal Reflection

Good

- Connections were made between the information and Ch. 22 of Texas Penal Code.
- Personal conclusions were drawn as information related to Law Enforcement and Texas Penal Code.

- Numerous connections were made to course material.
Fair

- Connections were made between the information and Ch. 22 of Texas Penal Code

- One clear connection was made in relation to Law Enforcement and/or Texas Penal Code.
Poor

- The personal response to the article did not fully relate the information to Ch. 22 of Texas Penal Code.

- Connections in relation to Law Enforcement and Penal Code.
Missing/Unacceptable

- Personal reaction to the article was undeveloped or missing.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98