iRubric: Architectural Styles rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Architectural Styles

This rubric is for a project for Interior Design that explores particular architectural designs in a certain time period.

Rubric Code: C636B3

By l_hall

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Architectural Styles
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good 5 pts
Use of Time	Poor Time was not used well in class - unnecessary talking, not staying on task, etc.	Fair Time was used in class with some distractions / talking, etc.	Good Time was well-used. Student focused on project with little to no distractions.
Clarity of Topic	Poor It is unclear what the student is trying to explain. Topic and information do not support each other.	Fair Student has a topic / title, but some of the information doesn't support topic.	Good Topic is clear, and content fully supports the title.
Content:	Poor Presentation included little of the needed content in detail, or all, but with no real detail or explanation. (Time period, house features, influential and political figures, period architects, historical events)	Fair Presentation included some of the needed content in detail, or all, but with little detail or explanation. (Time period, house features, influential and political figures, period architects, historical events)	Good Presentation included all, and possibly more, needed content in detail. (Time period, house features, influential and political figures, period architects, historical events)
Works Cited	Poor It is evident little research has gone into this project. Facts are sketchy at best.	Fair Most of the facts of accurate. References have been cited; most are from credible sources.	Good All facts are accurate, and references have been cited from credible sources.
Creativity, Organization, Neatness	Poor Project shows little to no thought or creativity. Looks thrown together at the last minute.	Fair Project is neat and organized, but not particularly creative. Or, is missing one of the three elements.	Good Project is well thought-out; neat, organized, and creative.
Timeliness	Poor Project is turned in more than one day late.	Fair Project is turned in on the same day, but not during the period.	Good Project is turned in at the specified time.
Member Participation	Poor It is evident not all members took part in creating this presentation. One group member did all the talking, or others talked but didn't know what they were speaking on; responsibility was not equally shared / taken.	Fair Although all members participated in the creation of this presentation, responsibility was not shared equally. At presentation everyone spoke, but may not have seemed to be familiar with the information they were speaking about.	Good All members took equal responsibility in the creation and presentation of this project. Everyone took turns in the presentation, and knew their information. It was evident they understood what they were talking about.
Preparedness	Poor Students were not ready to present. They had to still print out slides, and did not have rubric ready to give to the teacher. Not only did they have to be asked to take their turn, they almost didn't even take it when asked.	Fair Students were mostly ready to present, but had either the slides or the rubric missing. They had to be asked to take their turn.	Good Students were completely ready to present their project. They had all their paperwork in order, and volunteered to take their turn.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric