- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Web 2.0 Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Web 2.0 Evaluation Rubric Selecting Web 2.0 tools to accommodate fulfilling learning experiences and meeting objectives requires consideration of several factors. This rubric helps evaluate web-based tools best suited for specified needs. Rubric Code: C2W82B2 By malaikavarez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Survey Grade Levels: Graduate

Accessibility 25 % Accessibility criteria for Web 2.0 tools to meet instructional goals
	Unsuitable Few selection criteria MET 1 pts	Suitable Most selection criteria MET 3 pts	Most Suitable All selection criteria MET or EXCEEDED 5 pts
Accessibility 1.1 5 pts Accessible in multiple device formats	Unsuitable Works in Windows or Mac only	Suitable Works on both Windows and Mac	Most Suitable Works on both Windows and Mac, and all wireless mobile devices
Accessibility 1.2 5 pts Work product of tool viewable in a variety of web browsers	Unsuitable Works in explorer	Suitable Works on Chrome, Safari	Most Suitable Works on all web browsers
Accessibility 1.3 5 pts Options support ADA compliance	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Accessibility 1.4 4 pts Free	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Accessibility 1.5 1 pts Free trial period ≥ 30 days	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Accessibility 1.6 5 pts Work well in cases where network connection is slow	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Usability 25 % Usability criteria for Web 2.0 tools to meet instructional goals
	Unsuitable Few selection criteria MET 1 pts	Suitable Most selection criteria MET 3 pts	Most Suitable All selection criteria MET or EXCEEDED 5 pts
Usability 1.1 5 pts Must create an account to use the tool	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Usability 1.2 10 pts Tool is easy to navigate/ tool easy to use	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Usability 1.3 5 pts Comprehensive and easy to use Help section	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Usability 1.4 5 pts Any download and installation requirement on the device to use the tool	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Privacy & Security 25 % Privacy & security criteria for Web 2.0 tools
	Unsuitable Few selection criteria MET 1 pts	Suitable Most selection criteria MET 3 pts	Most Suitable All selection criteria MET or EXCEEDED 5 pts
Privacy & Security 1.1 5 pts restrict access of user's work	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Privacy & Security 1.2 5 pts protect your personal data (e.g. email address given when account created)	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Privacy & Security 1.3 5 pts Users retain sole IP rights to the content created	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Privacy & Security 1.4 5 pts allow you to determine the copyright status of the content you've created	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Privacy & Security 1.5 5 pts save a copy of the product to your desktop for archival purposes	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Efficiency & Effectiveness 25 % Efficiency & effectiveness criteria for Web 2.0 tools to meet instructional goals
	Unsuitable Few selection criteria MET 1 pts	Suitable Most selection criteria MET 3 pts	Most Suitable All selection criteria MET or EXCEEDED 5 pts
Efficiency & Effectiveness 1.1 10 pts easy to track student work (for grading purposes)	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Efficiency & Effectiveness 1.2 5 pts support private and public commenting (for individual and group feedback)	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Efficiency & Effectiveness 1.3 5 pts provide for an RSS feed to track work via email or an RSS reader?	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Efficiency & Effectiveness 1.4 5 pts possible to embed the tool into the LCMS you're using	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Engaging 25 % Engageability criteria for Web 2.0 tools to meet instructional goals
	Unsuitable Few selection criteria MET 1 pts	Suitable Most selection criteria MET 3 pts	Most Suitable All selection criteria MET or EXCEEDED 5 pts
Engaging 1.1 5 pts allow you to be creative during the learning process	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Engaging 1.2 5 pts allow you to demonstrate creativity in the learning product	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Engaging 1.3 5 pts provide opportunities for different types of interaction (visual, verbal, written)	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Engaging 1.4 5 pts increase the perception of connectedness	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable
Engaging 1.5 5 pts encourage collaboration	Unsuitable	Suitable	Most Suitable

Subjects:

Computers

Types:

Survey

Discuss this rubric