Skip to main content
iRubric: Puzzle Cube Presentation rubric

iRubric: Puzzle Cube Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Puzzle Cube Presentation 
PowerPoint and Presentation
Rubric Code: A22CC52
By sandrews07
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Performance Rubric
  unsatisfactory

5 pts

Basic

6.3 pts

Average

7.5 pts

Good

8.7 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Presentation

unsatisfactory

Students use no gestures and/or visual aid when trying to get his/her message across to the audience.


The student put no effort into the presentation.
Basic

Student uses gestures and/or visual aid with with little to no effectiveness in getting his/her message across to the audience.

The student puts forth little effort into the presentation however, the student presents little to no creativity in his/her presentation
Average

Student uses gestures and/or visual aid with some effectiveness in getting his/her message across to the audience.

The student puts forth some effort into the presentation and is somewhat creative; however, enthusiasm is lacking.
Good

Student uses gestures and/or visual aid effectively in getting their message across to the audience.

The students puts forth a considerable amount of effort into the presentation with some enthusiasm.
Excellent

Student uses gestures and/or visual aid with a high degree of effectiveness in getting his/her message across to the audience.

The student is extremely enthusiastic during his/her presentation.
Title Slide

unsatisfactory

The student did not have a title slide.
Basic

The student presents little to no creativity in his/her slide.
Average

The student's presentation is somewhat creative with much room for improvement.
Good

The student's presentation is creative and unique with some room for improvement.
Excellent

The student's work is very creative and unique!
Introductions

unsatisfactory

You just started in with info or forgot your name.
Basic

You said your name and there is some attempt to create an intro, but I am not hooked. There was nothing unique or creative about the intro, or it was hokey or gimmicky.
Average

You used a sentence to introduce yourself in a way that showed some relevance, but there was no creativity or memorable.
Good

You used a sentence to introduce yourself in a way that showed some relevance and there was some creativity and it was memorable in some way.
Excellent

OMG! I'm hooked!!! You were honest, but used a twist and now I want to know more.
Design Brief/ Research

unsatisfactory

Class time allocated for independent work is not present and highly evident in the outcome of your presentation.

I get no sense of what you want to do look into.
Basic

Class time allocated for independent work is somewhat present and evident in the outcome of your presentation.

Your explanation of the question/problem is either too simple or not understandable to most audiences.
Average

Class time allocated for independent work is mostly present and evident in the outcome of your presentation.

Your explanation of the question/problem is clear and understandable. It makes sense and explained fairly well.
Good

Class time allocated for independent work is present and evident in the outcome of your presentation.

Your explanation of the question/problem is very clear and understandable. It makes sense and explained very well.
Excellent

Class time allocated for independent work is obvious and highly evident in the outcome of your presentation.

Your explanation of the question/problem immediately seems important and understandable
Brainstorm

unsatisfactory

You made no attempt to tell me about your ideas, skills/experience or how they are relevant to the company.
Basic

I get minimal sense of who you are and have a general idea about your ideas and strengths/skillset but they are not relevant to the company.
Average

I get some sense of who you are and have a general idea about your ideas and strengths/skillset but not how it would benefit the company.
Good

I understand who you are, your ideas and skillset. You would work well with the company.
Excellent

You have told me what qualities/skills/experience are unique to you and I can see how you would add value to the company.
Design

unsatisfactory

Did not discuss strengths and why you chose your design. Audience is left unsure about your prototype.
Basic

Discussed whose design you chose but not why. Your strengths are uncertain and did not show that it met all the requirements.
Average

Discussed your strengths and design choice briefly. Your prototype met none of the requirements.
Good

Discussed your strengths and design choice fully. Displayed that your prototype met most of the requirements.
Excellent

Discussed your strengths and design choice fully. Displayed that your prototype met all the requirements.
Evaluate- Testing

unsatisfactory

Prototype is not functional. Pictures show that parts of the puzzle do not reflect the design sketches. Level of difficulty not classified
Basic

Prototype is not completely functional. Some parts of the puzzle reflect the design sketches. Level of difficulty not classified
Average

Prototype is functional. Most parts of the puzzle reflect the design sketches. Level of difficulty is briefly stated, with no attempt to explain.
Good

Prototype is functional. All parts of the puzzle reflect the design sketches. You stated the level of difficulty, but not why.
Excellent

Prototype is functional. All parts of the puzzle reflect the design sketches. You explained the level of difficulty and why.
Evaluate- Data

unsatisfactory

Prototype test results are not documented.
Basic

Prototype test results are poorly documented. Data is not explained
Average

Prototype test results are somewhat documented. Presenter explains data inappropriately or does not fully understand it themselves.
Good

Prototype test results are well documented. Data is explain and somewhat understandable.
Excellent

Prototype test results are well documented. Data is clearly explained and it is clear that the team knows what they are talking about.
Evaluate- Improve

unsatisfactory

The presenter delivers no information related to the team’s solution/ improvements.
Basic

The presenter delivers some of the information related to the team’s solution, but no improvements.
Average

The presenter adequately delivers information related to the team’s solution and skips around the idea of improvements.
Good

The presenter clearly delivers information related to the team’s solution/ improvements.
Excellent

The presenter effectively and creatively delivers information related to the team’s solution.
Closing Remarks

unsatisfactory

No closing remark or memorable end.
Basic

Closing remark was lacking effort or awkward and left the audience confused.
Average

Closing remark was somewhat relevant, but there was no creativity or memorable.
Good

Closing pitch held the audience's attention and was persuasive, but didn't leave the audience wanting more.
Excellent

Pitch held the audience's attention and was very persuasive. Creative and unique closing left the audience wanting to know more.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16