iRubric: Child Advocacy Exercise: Strengths and Risk rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Child Advocacy Exercise: Strengths and Risk

Rubric Code: A229W37

By kfrantel

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Child Advocacy Exercise
	Poor (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Macrosystem 13 % Risk and Protective factors for Macrosystem	Poor Writer identifies 2 or fewer factors in this domain.	Good Writer identifies a total of 3 factors in this domain, with at least 1 risk factor and 1 protective factor appropriate for this system.	Excellent Writer identifies at least 2 risk factors and 2 protective factors that are appropriate for this system.
Exosystem 13 % Risk and Protective factors for exosystem	Poor Writer identifies 2 or fewer factors in this domain.	Good Writer identifies a total of 3 factors in this domain, with at least 1 risk factor and 1 protective factor appropriate for this system.	Excellent Writer identifies at least 2 risk factors and 2 protective factors that are appropriate for this system.
Mesosystem 13 % Risk and Protective factors for mesosystem	Poor Writer identifies 2 or fewer factors in this domain.	Good Writer identifies a total of 3 factors in this domain, with at least 1 risk factor and 1 protective factor appropriate for this system.	Excellent Writer identifies at least 2 risk factors and 2 protective factors that are appropriate for this system.
Microsystem 13 % Risk and Protective factors for microsystem	Poor Writer identifies 2 or fewer factors in this domain.	Good Writer identifies a total of 3 factors in this domain, with at least 1 risk factor and 1 protective factor appropriate for this system.	Excellent Writer identifies at least 2 risk factors and 2 protective factors that are appropriate for this system.
ADDRESSING 26 % ADDRESSING table is completed	Poor ADDRESSING table is not fully or accurately complete. Writer has not indicated an asterisk next to dimensions that are identified as strong risk factors.	Good ADDRESSING table is fully complete with some mistakes/incorrect answers. Writer has indicated an asterisk next to at least one dimension that could be a risk factor.	Excellent ADDRESSING table is fully and accurately complete, with answers for each of the identity domains. Writer has indicated an asterisk next to dimensions that are identified as strong risk factors.
Therapist Reactions 26 % Response to additional questions about risk for suspension or expulsion; reaction as therapist	Poor Writer does not address the degree to which this client is at risk for suspension or expulsion. Writer does not describe behaviors of child using a trauma-informed perspective. The writer provides little detail or does not use a trauma-informed lens to describe how they would discuss the client concerns as a therapist.	Good Writer addresses the degree to which this client is at risk for suspension or expulsion. Writer describes behaviors of child using a trauma-informed perspective. There are a few sentences indicating the ways that the writer would describe the child's behavior in their role as a counselor/therapist. This description is written with a trauma-informed lens.	Excellent Writer addresses the degree to which this client is at risk for suspension or expulsion. Writer describes behaviors of child using a trauma-informed perspective. There are a few sentences indicating the ways that the writer would describe the child's behavior in their role as a counselor/therapist. This description is written with a trauma-informed lens.

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric