Skip to main content
Nicole Green's
Communications ePortfolio


RCampus


Reflections


Reflection: Case Studies

 

Task: Write a series of case studies.

 

Writing the case studies was a wonderful learning experience, and I learned a lot from the process as a whole. First, I wrote a series of questions which I thought would provide the most useful feedback from our users. To write these questions, I had to learn about the product (RCampus) so I explored the LMS extensively.

 

Next, I formulated an appropriate message to e-mail to select RCampus users, requesting their time for an interview. I learned how to use an electronic spreadsheet to keep track of my contacts and their responses during the process. For those who were willing to be interviewed, I gave the option to do the interview via phone or e-mail at their convenience. I scheduled phone interviews with many users; speaking to RCampus users about their experiences helped me feel more confident in my interviewing ability.

 

Read the case studies here.

 

Reflection: Journalism Ethics Film

 

Task: Watch Journaliam Ethics in America and write a brief response.

 

As with other ethical codes, there is a perennial concern that the standards of journalism are being ignored. One of the most controversial issues in modern reporting is media bias, especially on political issues, but also with regard to cultural and other issues. Sensationalism is also a common complaint. Minor factual errors are also extremely common, as almost anyone who is familiar with the subject of a particular report will quickly realize.

 

There are also some wider concerns, as the media continue to change, for example that the brevity of news reports and use of soundbites has reduced fidelity to the truth, and may contribute to a lack of needed context for public understanding. From outside the profession, the rise of news management contributes to the real possibility that news media may be deliberately manipulated. Selective reporting (spiking, double standards) are very commonly alleged against newspapers, and by their nature are forms of bias not easy to establish, or guard against.

 

(From: Wikipedia)

 

Reflection: U.S. Journalist Project

 

Task: Create a mini-newspaper. Write three types of articles, including headlines and sub-heads. Remember to design the layout and edit for AP Style.

 

While journalists in the United States and European countries have led in formulation and adoption of these standards, such codes can be found in news reporting organizations in most countries with freedom of the press. The written codes and practical standards vary somewhat from country to country and organization to organization, but there is a substantial overlap among mainstream publications and societies. The International Federation of Journalists launched a global Ethical Journalism Initiative [3] in 2008 aimed at strengthening awareness of these issues within professional bodies.

One of the leading voices in the U.S. on the subject of Journalistic Standards and Ethics is the Society of Professional Journalists. The Preamble to its Code of Ethics states:

...public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.
(From: Wikipedia)
Reflection: Blog Writing

 

Task: Pretend you have been hired by a major newspaper to write as their online presence.

 

Audiences have different reactions to depictions of violence, nudity, coarse language, or to people in any other situation that is unacceptable to or stigmatized by the local culture or laws (such as the consumption of alcohol, homosexuality, illegal drug use, scatological images, etc.). Even with similar audiences, different organizations and even individual reporters have different standards and practices. These decisions often revolve around what facts are necessary for the audience to know.

 

When certain distasteful or shocking material is considered important to the story, there are a variety of common methods for mitigating negative audience reaction. Advance warning of explicit or disturbing material may allow listeners or readers to avoid content they would rather not be exposed to. Offensive words may be partially obscured or bleeped. Potentially offensive images may be blurred or narrowly cropped. Descriptions may be substituted for pictures; graphic detail might be omitted. Disturbing content might be moved from a cover to an inside page, or from daytime to late evening, when children are less likely to be watching.

 

There is often considerable controversy over these techniques, especially concern that obscuring or not reporting certain facts or details is self-censorship that compromises objectivity and fidelity to the truth, and which does not serve the public interest.

 

(From: Wikipedia)

 



n16