Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Project 3rd grade rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Project 3rd grade
Science Fair Project_5th grade
Rubric to assess student work and completion of a science project using the scientific method.
Rubric Code:
Q4X68W
By
marreroacademy
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Scientific Method
No attempt
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Outstanding
10 pts
Question
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Question is not stated correctly and is not testable.
Fair
Question is stated correctly, but is not testable.
Good
Question is stated correctly and is testable.
Excellent
Question is stated correctly, is testable and is accompanied with a summary of why the student wants to answer the question.
Outstanding
Question is stated correctly, is testable, and is accompanied with a summary/description of why the student wants to answer the question.
Hypothesis
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Hypothesis is unrelated to the purpose of the project. It is not tested throughout the project.
Fair
Hypothesis is stated correctly, but does not correlate to the question of the project and is not testable.
Good
Hypothesis correlates to the question but is not testable.
Excellent
Hypothesis is testable and directly correlates to the question.
Outstanding
Hypothesis is testable and directly correlates to the question. Hypothesis is also stated correctly and is followed through with the conclusion.
Materials
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Not a complete description.
Fair
List of materials was jumbled and unclear.
Good
Student used appropiate materials but did not list them at all.
Excellent
Student used appropiate materials but did not list all of them.
Outstanding
Student used and listed all appropiate materials based on the experiment requirements.
Procedure
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Not a complete description.
Fair
Student lists steps out of order. The procedure is confusing.
Good
Student lists a few of the steps taken for a complete and thorough experiment.
Excellent
Student lists the steps taken for a complete and thorough experiment.
Outstanding
Student completely lists the steps taken for a complete and thorough experiment and another student could complete the experiment with these directions.
Results/Data
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Results/Data do not describe the experiment.
Fair
Reults/ Data given in sentences, not charts, graphs or tables.
Good
Results/ Data given using charts, graphs or tables but is difficult to understand.
Excellent
Results/ Data given using charts, graphs, or tables but is done sloppily.
Outstanding
Results/ Data given is easy to understand charts, graphs, or tables.
Conclusion
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Analysis is simple and lacks details.
Fair
Analysis has few details.
No summary.
Good
Analysis has few details with a summary.
Excellent
Detailed analysis of project.
No summary.
Outstanding
Detailed analysis of project and summary of project is given.
Overall Project
No attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Fair
Student has a workable idea for the project but does not follow through the steps completely.
Good
Student has a good working idea for the project and followed all steps in order.
Excellent
Student somewhat implements a creative idea for the project and follows all steps in order with success.
Outstanding
Student implements a creative idea for the project and follows all steps with success.
Written Paper/ Presentation
This section will count as an English grade.
No Attempt
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Outstanding
10 pts
Paper- Title Page
Must include:
Name, Date, and Title
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Is poorly done and is sloppy.
Fair
Does not have the correct parts and is not on a separate sheet of paper.
Good
Includes at least one of the correct parts and is on a separate sheet of paper.
Excellent
Includes at least two of the correct parts and is on a separate sheet of paper.
Outstanding
Includes title, name and date and is on a seperate sheet of paper.
Knowledge of Topic
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Student does not answer questions presented by others regarding project in an informative and knowledgeable manner.
Fair
Student answers questions with little to basic knowledge of project and is difficult to understand.
Good
Student answers some questions with basic to good knowledge of project
Excellent
Student answers questions well with a large amount of knowledge about project and can support answers with research, if necessary.
Outstanding
Student answers all questions knowledgeably with a great understanding of topic, as well as necessary research to support claims. Student's answers are easy to understand.
Paper Organization
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Hand written paper, not all 7 parts are included.
Fair
Paper is typed but is missing some parts.
Good
Hand written, all 7 parts are included in order.
Excellent
Paper is typed, all 7 parts are included but not in order.
Outstanding
Paper is typed, all 7 parts are included and in order.
Grammar/ Mechanics
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Has plenty of errors in spelling, grammar and mechanics. The paper is difficult to understand.
Fair
Has errors in spelling, grammar, and mechanis that interfere with understnading
Good
Has errors in spelling, grammar, adn mechanics but paper is still easy to understand.
Excellent
Has minimal errors in spelling, grammar, and mechanics but the paper is still easy to understand
Outstanding
Relatively free of mistakes in spelling, grammar and mechanics
Oral Presentation
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Mumbling, difficult to hear, difficult to understand
Fair
Softly spoken, difficult to hear, pacing of speech too slow or too fast, little to no eye contact
Good
Good volume, pacing of speech too slow or too fast, little to no eye contact.
Excellent
Good volume, pacing of speech was appropriate but minimal eye contact.
Outstanding
Great speaking volume, spoken clearly, eye contact with the audience, pacing of speech was appropriate.
Display
No Attempt
0 pts
Poor
2 pts
Fair
4 pts
Good
6 pts
Excellent
8 pts
Outstanding
10 pts
Display
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Fair
Good
Display is on a poster board.
Excellent
Outstanding
Display is on three-sided presentation board.
Display - Title
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Fair
Good
Title is on the board, but is not obvious.
Excellent
Outstanding
Title is clear and easy to see on the display.
Information
No Attempt
No Attempt
Poor
Display has drawings of the experiment.
Data is not shown in a chart, table or graph.
Fair
Data is shown with a chart, graph or table.
No photographs or drawings of the experiment
Good
Display shows photographs of the experiment without captions; may have a chart, table or graph to show data.
Excellent
Display shows photographs (with captions) of various steps of the experiment,; uses charts, graphs, or tables to show data.
Outstanding
Display shows photographs (with captions) of the experiment step-by-step; uses tables, graphs, or charts to display data.
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.