- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Science Learning Center Rubric II

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Science Learning Center Rubric II Science Learning Center Rubric II Used to assess how well students participate, engage one another, meet the objectives and accomplish the tasks set at a self-directed learning center Rubric Code: H9B596 By missy49120 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

Learning Center Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Well done 3 pts	Minimal 2 pts	Improvement Needed 0 pts
Group Engagement	Excellent -Partners work together to complete the Tasks as instructed. -Partners interact well with each other without arguing.	Well done -Partners work together to complete the Tasks with minimal arguing and evidence of compromise.	Minimal -Partners work together, but tend to argue instead of discussing their differences with little evidence of compromise.	Improvement Needed -Partners do not work together and argue without compromising.
Participation	Excellent -Student works hard to complete all tasks in the time given.	Well done -Student completes almost all tasks during class time.	Minimal -Student does minimal work, or rushes to complete quickly without regard to quality. -Student displays off-task behavior.	Improvement Needed -Student refuses to work. -Student allows partner to work without giving input. -Student displays off-task behavior multiple times.
Task Completion	Excellent -All Learning Center Tasks (Partner and Individual) are complete. Work is high quality, and completed as instructed	Well done -Most Learning Center tasks are completed correctly, as instructed by the teacher.	Minimal -Learning Center work is acceptable quality, but varies greatly from instructions given by the teacher.	Improvement Needed -Individual work is incomplete.
Science Journal	Excellent Directions were followed - 5 layers are clearly explained in journal responses. Work is neatly done with no more than 2 spelling/grammar errors.	Well done Directions were followed - 4 layers are clearly explained in journal responses. Work is neatly done with no more than 3 spelling/grammar errors.	Minimal Directions were not closely followed - 2 or 3 layers are somewhat explained in journal responses. Work is not neatly done and/or has more than 4 spelling/ grammar errors.	Improvement Needed Directions were not followed and no clear layering was evident in journal responses. Work is not neatly done and includes many spelling/grammar errors.