Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: RS 4500 Course Project Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
RS 4500 Course Project Report
RS 5400 Course Project Report
Rubric Code:
Z246X7X
By
elektra
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
RS 4500 Course Project Report
Excellent
10 pts
Good
8.5 pts
Fair
7.3 pts
Below Expectations
5.5 pts
Partner Description
pts
Excellent
Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), membership, and existing sustainable systems, demonstrates excellent observation and research.
Description of course partner's strengths and challenges aligns strongly with the challenge(s) set forth by the course partner.
Good
Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), membership, and existing sustainable systems, demonstrates good observation and research.
Description of course partner's strengths and challenges aligns with the challenge(s) set forth by the course partner.
Fair
Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), membership, and existing sustainable systems, demonstrates fair observation and research.
Description of course partner's strengths and challenges aligns somewhat with the challenge(s) set forth by the course partner.
Below Expectations
Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), membership, and existing sustainable systems, demonstrates mimimal observation and research.
Description of course partner's strengths and challenges doesn't align with the challenge(s) set forth to the by the course partner.
Analysis
pts
Excellent
Clear and rational analysis
of the course partner's assets, liabilities,existing and potential partnerships that strongly relate to concepts learned in the course. Analysis raises excellent questions for investigation.
Good
Good analysis of the course partner's assets, liabilities,existing and potential partnerships that relate to concepts learned in the course. Analysis raises useful questions for investigation.
Fair
Mostly clear analysis of the course partner's assets and liabilities that relate to concepts learned in the course.
Below Expectations
The work doesn't clearly move beyond a summary of the course partner description to provide an analysis. Analysis minimally relates to concepts learned in the course.
Recommendations
25 pts
Excellent
Recommendations are highly responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Recommendations clearly describe a suggested course of action to solve a particular challenge, are written as action statements without justification and are stated in clear, specific language.
Good
Recommendations are mostly responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Recommendations describe a suggested course of action to solve a particular challenge, are written as action statements, and are stated in language that is mostly clear and specific.
Fair
Recommendations are somewhat responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Recommendations describe a suggested course of action that somewhat relates to a particular challenge, and are stated in language that is somewhat clear and specific.
Below Expectations
Recommendations are minimally responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Recommendations describe a suggested course of action that minimally relates to a particular challenge, and are stated in language that is not clear and specific.
Integration of Knowledge
pts
Excellent
Demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer's own insights. Concluding remarks show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
Good
Demonstrates the the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
Fair
Demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Below Expectations
Does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
Information Literacy
pts
Excellent
Demonstrates strong SYNTHESIS of topic through at least FIVE well chosen, quality sources from books, database articles, or academic/professional websites.
Sources appear as in-text citations and
on a works cited page.
Good
Demonstrates successful COMPILATION of topic info from FOUR quality sources from books, academic/professional websites,
database articles.
Sources appear as in-text citations and on a works cited page.
Fair
Sources CATEGORIZED to support topic & include THREE well chosen, quality sources from books, database articles, or academic/professional websites.
Sources are in-text citations and on a works cited page.
Below Expectations
Demonstrates minimal effort to use two sources effectively:
*The source(s) may be of low quality
*The sources do not appear as in-text citations and/or on a works cited page.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Communication
English
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Writing
ePortfolio
Reflection
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.