Skip to main content
iRubric: RS 5400 Course Project Report rubric

iRubric: RS 5400 Course Project Report rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
RS 5400 Course Project Report 
Creating an Online Community
Rubric Code: N23X237
By elektra
Draft
Private Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric RS 5400 Course Project Report
  Excellent

100-90%

(N/A)

Good

8.5 pts

Fair

7.3 pts

Below Expectations

5.5 pts

Partner Description
pts

Excellent

Information about the product relates directly to product and catches the reader's attention to persuade them to want to purchase the product.
Good

Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), active members, and existing partnerships, demonstrates good observation and research.

Description of course partner's coalition building strengths and challenges aligns with the challenge(s) set forth by the course partner.
Fair

Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), active members, and existing partnerships, demonstrates fair observation and research.

Description of course partner's coalition building strengths and challenges aligns somewhat with the challenge(s) set forth by the course partner.
Below Expectations

Description of course partner's purpose, physical setting(s), active members, and existing partnerships, demonstrates mimimal observation and research.

Description of course partner's coalition building strengths and challenges doesn't align with the challenge(s) set forth to the by the course partner.
Analysis
pts

Excellent

Product name is clear
and attractive; all important information present; appeals to the appropriate target audience. Work is simple, clear and bold.
Good

Good analysis of the course partner's assets, liabilities,existing and potential partnerships that relate to building coalitions. Analysis raises useful questions for investigation.
Fair

Mostly clear analysis of the course partner's assets and liabilities that relate to building coalitions.
Below Expectations

The work doesn't clearly move beyond a summary of the course partner description to provide an analysis. Analysis minimally relates to buliding coalitions.
Recommendations
25 pts

Excellent

Recommendations are highly responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Good

Recommendations are mostly responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Fair

Recommendations are somewhat responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Below Expectations

Recommendations are minimally responsive to the challenges expressed by the course partner.
Integration of Knowledge
pts

Excellent

Demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer's own insights. Concluding remarks show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
Good

Demonstrates the the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
Fair

Demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
Below Expectations

Does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course.
Asset Map
pts

Excellent

Presents at least TEN well-chosen assets that strongly support course partner in addressing their challenge(s)

Asset Map strongly supports the course partner's ability to build coalitions.
Good

Presents at least SEVEN well-chosen assets that support course partner in addressing their challenge(s)

Asset Map supports the course partner's ability to build coalitions.
Fair

Presents at least FIVE assets that support course partner in addressing their challenge(s)

Asset Map mostly supports the course partner's ability to build coalitions.
Below Expectations

Presents THREE OR LESS assets that support course partner in addressing their challenge(s)

Asset Map minimally supports the course partner's ability to build coalitions.
Information Literacy
pts

Excellent

Demonstrates strong SYNTHESIS of topic through at least FIVE well chosen, quality sources from books, database articles, or academic/professional websites.

Sources appear as in-text citations and
on a works cited page.
Good

Demonstrates successful COMPILATION of topic info from FOUR quality sources from books, academic/professional websites,
database articles.

Sources appear as in-text citations and on a works cited page.
Fair

Sources CATEGORIZED to support topic & include THREE well chosen, quality sources from books, database articles, or academic/professional websites.

Sources are in-text citations and on a works cited page.
Below Expectations

Demonstrates minimal effort to use two sources effectively:

*The source(s) may be of low quality
*The sources do not appear as in-text citations and/or on a works cited page.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Add to Gallery

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16