- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Water Cycle Research rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Water Cycle Research Water Cycle Research Students will research the water cycle. Students will describe the watercycle using correct terminology students will describe the states of matter found in the water cycle and how the states change from one to another in terms of kinetic theory Rubric Code: XX9W6B5 By earogers Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Category
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	unacceptable (N/A)
Content 1 10points The student researches and describes the water cycle	Excellent Water cycle is described in great detail using all correct terminology and all 3 familiar states of matter are represented	Good Water cycle is described and all 3 familiar states of matter represented but details are missing	Fair Water cycle is described and all 3 familiar states of matter represented but some components missing or incorrect	unacceptable Water cycle is incorrectly or poorly described and / or 3 familiar states of matter are not represented
content 2 10pts The student uses there knowledge of kinetic theory	Excellent A good description of the arrangement of water particles is described at each stage of the water cycle, and description of where and how state changes occur with in the water cycle	Good The arrangement of particles is described at each stage of the water cycle, and a description of how state changes occur in the water cycle, but a lack of details or mistakes is evident	Fair The arrangement of particles is described at each stage of the water cycle, and a description of how state changes occur in the water cycle, but sections of information is missing	unacceptable the arrangement of particles are not described at each stage, one or more is missing descriptions of how state changes occur in the water cycle are missing
Presentation 5pts	Excellent Project demonstrates fantastic imagination and creativity. Different, well presented	Good Project demonstrates good imagination and creativity Well presented	Fair Project demonstrates little imagination and creativity	unacceptable The project is poorly presented
mechanics 5pts the project is original (not plagiarized) all research material is sited	Excellent The project is 100% original and all material is properly cited	Good the project is100% original, but some citations are incorrect or missing	Fair the project is t100 % original and only some citations are given	unacceptable the project is not 100% original or there are no citation.