Skip to main content
iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 rubric

iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302 
Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO302
Rubric Code: WX35B72
By DrCandy
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Component
40 %
  High Distinction

100-85%

(N/A)

Distinction

84-75%

(N/A)

Credit

74-65%

(N/A)

Pass

64-50%

(N/A)

Fail

Below 50%

(N/A)

Introduction
20 %
Introduction
10 %

Introduces and succinctly clarifies the situation faced by the grieving client.
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to interpret and understand the issues presented in the case study and summarise them succinctly and accurately.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to understand and analyse the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with some problems with clarity.
Credit

Evidence of understanding the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with many problems with clarity.
Pass

Reproduced the case study details only, and many problems with clarity.
Fail

No evidence of ability to understand or succinctly define the case study.
Introduction
10 %

Provides an overview definition of the client's complicated grief issues and the approach that should be taken.
High Distinction

A succinct and clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay is given, including the relevant theories and ideas to be discussed.
Distinction

A clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, with some problems with clarity and writing.
Credit

An introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, but with many problems with clarity and writing.
Pass

An introduction is offered, but with some errors in clarity of what the paper will be written on, and many problems with writing.
Fail

No summary of overview and focus of essay offered.
Main Body
55 %
Main Body
20 %

Theories, concepts and ideas of approach chosen match effectively with client's complicated grief issues.
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the grieving client effectively, and communicate this succinctly.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the grieving client, and communicate these effectively.
Credit

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the grieving client.
Pass

Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate theories, concepts and ideas which attempt to match the issues of the grieving client, but with many problems accurately communicating them.
Fail

No evidence of knowledge of appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the client.
Main Body
20 %

An insightful explanation of key links between issues faced by the grieving client and the relevant therapeutic approach is provided.
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate and relevant psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is communicated succinctly.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is communicated succinctly.
Credit

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the grieving client are made, and this is not clearly communicated.
Pass

Evidence of ability to reproduce psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the client are made, but with many problems linking the issues with strategies, and with communicating these links.
Fail

No evidence of knowledge of relevant psychotherapeutic strategies for the presenting issues of the client.
Main Body
15 %

Comprehensive citation of relevant literature sources are provided.
High Distinction

Comprehensive citation of relevant literature sources are made.
Distinction

Most citations of relevant literature sources are made.
Credit

Some citations of relevant literature sources are made.
Pass

Few citations of relevant literature sources are made.
Fail

No evidence of sourcing and citing appropriate literature sources are found.
Conclusion
15 %
Conclusion
10 %

A succinct and precise summary of the relevant issues faced by the grieving client and their relevance to key theoretical ideas have been made.
High Distinction

A succinct and precise summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.
Distinction

A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given.
Credit

A summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and key theories are given.
Pass

A weak summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and theories are given.
Fail

No summary of essay offered.
Conclusion
5 %

Effective recommendations for the client, with regard to possible solutions and/or future directions, are made.
High Distinction

A succinct and precise summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.
Distinction

A succinct summary of the appropriate recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions are given.
Credit

A summary of the appropriate recommendations and future directions or solutions are given.
Pass

A weak summary of the recommendations are given, but may not include any solutions and/or future directions.
Fail

No summary of recommendations, possible solutions and/or future directions given.
Overall Quality of Paper
10 %
Overall Quality of Paper
5 %

Quality of writing style
High Distinction

Evidence of excellent essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Distinction

Evidence of good essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Credit

Evidence of satisfactory essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Pass

Evidence of some essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Fail

No evidence of essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Overall Quality of Paper
5 %

Use of APA formatting and referencing.
High Distinction

Accurate use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.
Distinction

Good use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.
Credit

Satisfactory use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.
Pass

Evidence of use of APA 6th ed. formatting and referencing used throughout the essay.
Fail

No evidence of use of APA formatting.



Keywords:
  • case study, counselling


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98