iRubric: Annotated Bibliography of 10 Resources for Content Reading rubric

The summary was not included, or was plagiarized, or was not accuratley paraphrased from the original source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is.

Inadequate description of study, how study was undertaken, results of study & recommendations or applications to present research or your interest area.

Aspects of summary included but some of the important information was missing.
Some annotations merely summarize the source.

All important information was described well, why study was conducted, where, methods, results, and application.

A reflection and/or connection to practice was not included. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?

A reflection was included in some, but not all of the 10 annotations. The did nont include a connect to practice or accuaratley deptict the source's usefulness for educators.

A reflection was included in all 10 annotations. Some of the reflections lacked depth of personal connection.

A critical reflection was included in each of the 10 resource, at least 3 of which are websites. The refections included connections the author made to current practice.