Skip to main content
iRubric: Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection rubric

iRubric: Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection 
Film Evaluation and Review with Reflection
Provide a summary and analysis of the film(s). Write a personal response and reflection of the film, including if applicable the source it was based upon.
Rubric Code: TX7222A
By mmejutard
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Qualities and Criteria
These are the components of the paper that are evaluated.
  Unacceptable

0 pts

Poor

This category will reflect that the student did not put forth effort or understanding of the assignment. Paper does not follow guidelines. No assistance was sought for problems. Potentially failing paper.

65 pts

Fair

A paper of fair quality will show some effort but lack analysis or structure qualities as presented in the guidelines.

75 pts

Good

A good paper has the general structure and mechanics expressed in the guidelines with a few areas of weakness. A good paper could be made excellent with help from learning resources.

85 pts

Excellent

An excellent paper follow all guidelines clearly and shows significant thought and effort. If the student struggled with an area, assistance with improvement was found. Mechanics are near perfect.

100 pts

Format of Paper
10 %

-Organization
-Length
-Font
-MLA style
Unacceptable

-No apparent format.
-One or two page submission
-No outline
-Email, handwritten
-Not in MS Word
-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Poor

- Does not follow an organized outline of ideas
- Length is too short or too long
-Identified font is not used
-Margins are not set
-Pages not numbered
Fair

-Some outline attempted in organization of ideas
-Unclear transitions to new ideas
-Length is not met or font is not appropriate
Good

-Outline is clear in presentation of ideas
-Appropriate length of paper
-Correct font is used
Excellent

-Very clear and organized ideas
-Strong presentation of paper outline
-Correct length
-Correct font
Content of Summary of Film
20 %

-Identifies characters
-Notes main plot
-Clear idea of what the film was about
Unacceptable

-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Poor

-Does not give reader a summary of the film
-Main characters and plot is not addressed
-Glosses over, disorganized
-not clear what the film is about
Fair

-Gives a general idea of the film but lacks in clarity of the plot and characters
-Too short, almost synopsis
-Crucial Plot and Character actions not addressed
-Provided spoilers and ending
Good

-Gives detailed explanation of the film's main plot and characters extending beyond two paragraphs
Addresses either plot twist or character's motive
-Provided some spoilers of plot and character
Excellent

-Gives reader a clear understanding of the film along with the main characters and plot in an appropriate amount of space that is no more than two paragraphs
-Addresses plot twist and/or character's motive
-Does not give away ending or spoilers
Analysis of Film
35 %

-Relation to the topics discuss in class
-Use of terminology from course
-Shows critical thinking
Unacceptable

-Quotes not identified and
unacceptable.
-No formal descriptions
-Illustrations not included
-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Poor

-Provides no critical thinking and only a summary of what occurred
-Gives no relation to the course work or terminology
-No focus on what caught the writer's attention
Fair

-Uses some basic course terminology but limited critical thinking about the film's purpose, theme, actions, and/or conflict presented
-no articulation of both films' purpose.
Good

-Provides new perspective and relation to the issues addressed in the course
-Uses terminology learned from the course in appropriate ways
-Articulates director's, actor's vision, approach to the film adaption in one of the films
Excellent

-Provides evidence of critical thinking
-Avoids simple explanations of terminology but rather relates the terminology to the film and the purpose
-Articulates director's, actor's vision, approach to the film adaptation on both films
Personal Reflection
20 %

-Addresses personal reaction to film
-Acknowledges any emotion or thought of a personal nature
Unacceptable

-Nothing submitted
-No reflection and/or reaction
-Not the assigned task, off task
Poor

-Very vague and no personal reaction included
-Inappropriate use of reflection taking up majority of the paper
-Disjointed
Fair

-Some reflection but lacks in ability to relate to what was learned through the film
Good

-Good overall reaction is presented
-Reflection of what was personally learned from the film and the relation to the course
Excellent

-Reflection flows well and integrates learning from the coursework as well as the film
-Expression of some personal reaction to the film, the book, and the course (if applicable).
Mechanics
10 %

-Grammar
-Spelling
-Punctuation
Unacceptable

-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Poor

-Many spelling errors
-Difficulty understanding ideas due to improper grammar
-Significant punctuation errors
Fair

-Spelling errors
-Several grammatical errors
-Punctuation errors
Good

-Generally appropriate usage of grammar and punctuation
-Evidence of spell check used
Excellent

-Virtually free of grammar and spelling errors
-Limited punctuation errors
Style
5 %

-Vocabulary
-Clichés
-Use of qualifiers
-Homonyms
-Erudition
Unacceptable

-Same as above
-Full of clichés
-Dominant use of qualifiers (very, often, hopefully, practically, basically, really, mostly)
-No voice
-Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Poor

-Mismatch in tone
-Too Wordy
-Vague
-Lots of qualifiers
-Used two words that mean the same thing
-Student's voice is lost because of abused of stock phrases
Fair

-Tone is disjointed
-Some wordiness
-Some vague language usage
-Opens with a cliché
-Some qualifiers
-Some homonyms
-There is a glimmer of student's voice
Good

-Appropriate tone
-Appropriate and correct usage of vocabulary
-Language usage is appropriate
-Almost not qualifiers
-Avoids clichés
-Student's voice is present in various paragraphs
Excellent

-Excellent tone
-Vocabulary is simple, yet specific to paper
-Avoidance of qualifiers or fillers
-No clichés
-No homonyms
-Clearly the student has developed his/her own voice
-Bravo, well done!





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16