Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Latino Needs Assesment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Latino Needs Assesment
Guided Community Assessment
The purpose is to understand the impact of the community setting upon the well-being of the Latino population. For the purposes of this assignment, you will rely primarily on observation and information about your field practicum agency and the Latino population to analyze the quality of system interactions within the social context.
Rubric Code:
SX73C7B
By
nina81665
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Community Assessment Rubric
Excellent
8.75 pts
Good
7 pts
Fair
5 pts
Poor
3 pts
Focus
15%
Excellent
Purpose is clear
Good
Shows awareness of purpose
Fair
Shows limited awareness of purpose
Poor
No awareness
Observation of Agency
20%
Excellent
The observation is thorough and all subsections outlined for the assignment are addressed.
Very descriptive, detailed with visual examples of service delivery and interactions within the social context, well-written and all directions followed.
Good
Observations of subsections are stated or addressed but, lack detail.
The Latino population and the agency is primarily described with some examples of service delivery and interactions within the social context.
Fair
Observations in some subsections are addressed, a clear picture of the agency and Latino population, service delivery, interactions within the social context is not accomplished.
Poor
Observations of subsections are vague and non-descriptive.
Data on your field practicum agency
20%
Excellent
All data is provided for each section outlined in the assignment. Data provides a clear image of the delivery of services and impact on Latino population. If there is a subsection that is not relevant, description about why it is not considered is explained and justified.
Good
At least 6 sections are described based on the outline of the assignment. Data provides some information of the delivery of services and makes an effort to discuss the impact on the Latino population.
Fair
At least 4 sections are completed using data. Data lacks information of the delivery of services and impact on the Latino population.
Poor
Less than 4 sections or inaccurate information. Data not reflective of the delivery of services and impact on the Latino population.
Research
25%
Excellent
Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Used (6) sources to support evidence and facts of the Latino population and agency services. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style.
Good
Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. Used (5) sources to support evidence and facts of the Latino population and agency services. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet
Fair
Sources (3) support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
Poor
The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page.
Organization and Structure
20%
Excellent
Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. There is clear use of a personal and unique style of writing, suited to audience and purpose; the paper holds the reader’s interest with ease. Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation.
Good
Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. There is an attempt at a personal style but style of writing may be awkward or unsuited to audience and purpose; the reader may lose interest in some sections of the paper. A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many.
Fair
Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. There is little attempt at style; reads as flat and perhaps uninteresting in content, which is usually generalized and clichéd. Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading.
Poor
Sentences aren’t clear. No attempt at style. Continuous errors.
Keywords:
Community-as-Partner Model; community assessment; social services
Subjects:
Health
Social Sciences
Nursing
Types:
Project
Assignment
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.