Skip to main content
iRubric: Cell Transport Cooperative Group 3 part project rubric

iRubric: Cell Transport Cooperative Group 3 part project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Cell Transport Cooperative Group 3 part project 
Biology Group Presentation
Jigsaw group graphic organizer, Google Slides and visual presentation prepared for 5th grade students.
Rubric Code: QX74762
By kathy_snyder
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Categories
  Poor

0 pts

(N/A)

Fair

2 pts

(N/A)

Good

3 pts

(N/A)

Excellent

5 pts

(N/A)

Comments

N/A

(N/A)

Google Slides content

Content correct, paraphrased, and cited
Poor

Evidence of plagiarism, or incorrect content, or not done at all.
Fair

Evidence that concepts were paraphrased, but lacked detail. Citations were included, but too few resources were used.
Good

Concepts were paraphrased, and most had significant detail. Citations were correct.
Excellent

Concepts were succinctly paraphrased with significant detail making student understanding clear. Citations were correct.
Comments
Google Slides mechanics

Type size, volume, animations, images
Poor

Too much type, too small, and little contrast between background and font. Too many animations, too distracting.
Fair

Font size smaller than 20, little contrast between type and background, Appropriate number of animations and images.
Good

Font size between 20 - 24. Lack of contrast between font color and background. Well designed animations and images.
Excellent

Font size between 20 - 24. Good contrast between font color and background. Well designed animations and images.
Comments
Class team work

Team rules, interaction, planning
Poor

Contribution was minimal, deadlines were not met, attitude was not focussed.
Fair

Contribution approached expectations, however deadlines were met, and student was well focussed.
Good

Contribution met expectations, deadlines were met, student was well focussed.
Excellent

Contribution met expectations, deadlines were met, student was well focussed. Student took a leadership role.
Comments
Rubric

Student used rubric to guide goal setting and use of class time.
Poor

No evidence that rubric was consulted.
Fair

Student applied less than 50 % of rubric categories.
Good

Student applied between 51 and 99 % of rubric categories.
Excellent

Evidence of total application of rubric categories.
Comments
Graphic Organizer

Team goal
Poor

Team had difficulty arriving at a conclusion about the type of graphic organizer, and as a result it was poorly constructed and not informative.
Fair

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, but procrastinated in creating it resulting in a poorly constructed document.
Good

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, but some of the members took full responsibility for its completion. Informative.
Excellent

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, all members assisted with it. It was informative and well constructed.
Comments
Punctuality

Group/individual met deadlines
Poor

Individual research was not completed and included in the Google Slides presentation on time. Group did not meet deadlines.
Fair

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, but procrastinated in creating it resulting in a poorly constructed document.
Good

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, but some of the members took responsibility for completion. Informative.
Excellent

Team agreed upon the graphic organizer, all members assisted with it. It was informative and well constructed.
Comments
Group work/study time

Agenda, rules, debrief
Poor

Group did not use time wisely. Group did not stay on task and did not work on project without constant prompting from teacher. Rules were not followed, debriefing was not done.
Fair

Needs improvement wise use of time. Group was not fully focused on project. Teacher had to speak to the group to keep them on task. Rules followed occasionally.
Good

Wise time usage. Group was focused on task. Asked questions when stuck or required guidance. Rules were followed, agendas were created.
Excellent

Group stayed on task. Group was organized and able to complete project with little to no assistance from the teacher. Groups set and followed agendas and debriefed.
Comments
Visual Aid

Visual aspect of project was organized and easy to read.
Poor

Visual aid was very disorganized and hard to read/understand. Contained lots of grammatical or pronunciation mistakes.
Fair

Visual aid could be better organized and easier to read or understand. Some grammatical or pronunciation errors.
Good

Visual aid was organized and easy to read/understand. Very few grammatical / pronunciation errors.
Excellent

Visual aid was easy to read and understand, organized and creative. No grammatical errors or mispronounced words, and was eye-catching.
Comments
Punctuality

Google slides, graphic organizer, and presentation
Poor

Individual did not meet the deadline for Google Slides submission, Group did not meet graphic organizer or presentation deadline.
Fair

Individual deadline for Google Slides was met. Either the graphic organizer or presentation deadlines were not met.
Good

Graphic organizer deadline was met by the group and the individual's contribution to the Google slides presentation was completed on time. No evidence of rehearsal of the presentation.
Excellent

Graphic organizer deadline was met by the group & the individual's contribution to the presentation was completed on time. Clear evidence of group rehearsal.
Comments
Citation/paraphrase

References cited, and no plagiarism
Poor

Fewer than 2 references, and/or evidence of plagiarism of written materials.
Fair

Between 3 and 5 total resources (group) and > 25% of project was copied and pasted without paraphrase.
Good

Between 6 and 7 resources used for the group project. Minimal (<10%) copied and pasted without paraphrase.
Excellent

More than 7 vetted references used for the group project. No evidence of copied and pasted wording.
Comments



Keywords:
  • Diffusion osmosis facilitated transport passive cell membrane lipid bilayer



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98