Skip to main content
iRubric: COUN 5310.14 Forum 3 Rubric

iRubric: COUN 5310.14 Forum 3 Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COUN 5310.14 Forum 3 Rubric 
Rubric to be used for COUN 5310 Human Development-Week 3 Part 1: Response to initial postings in Focused Forum 2 Part 2: Initial posting for Focused Forum 3-"Death"
Rubric Code: MXWA282
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Part 1 (Due Tuesday, 9/23, 11:55pm
Part 1: Reflections of initial posts for teammates from Focused Forum 2
1. Go to Focused Forum 2

2. Read and briefly respond (~75 +/- 15 words) to each of your small group members' initial posting in Forum 2
  Poor

Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below

10 pts

Marginal or N/A

Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range

17.2 pts

Excellent

Effort at this level evidences some mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"

20 pts

Quality of Replies

Poor

Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Marginal or N/A

Replies are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.
Excellent

Replies show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material when appropriate Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.
Quantity of Response

Respond to the initial threads of at least one other student. Respond to an additional student and receive more credit.

Poor

Provided no (0) replies to the initial postings of other students.
Marginal or N/A

Provided a reply to the initial postings of one (1) other student
Excellent

Provided replies to the initial postings of two or more (2+) students.
Length of Response

Target Response: (~75 +/- 15 words)

Poor

Less than 60 or more than 90 words/teammate
Marginal or N/A

N/A
Excellent

Between 60-90 words/teammate
Grammar/Mechanics

Applies to Part 1

Poor

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in multiple posts/replies. Written in language that is unclear or difficult to comprehend, using frequent abbreviations or "texting" style language.
Marginal or N/A

Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is clear with few abbreviations or "texting" style language.
Excellent

Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Part 2 (Due Tuesday, 9/23, 11:55pm
Part 2: Death Focused Questions
1. Go to Focused Forum 3
2. Read/be familiar with Kubler-Ross Death: The final stage of growth pp. xiv-72.
3. Choose 1 particular sentence or paragraph that grabbed your attention from your readings and post it along with the reference (p. #)
4. Reflect in ~125 +/-25 words on why you chose this material and how it is relevant to your life as a practitioner.
  Poor

Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below

10 pts

Marginal or N/A

Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range

17.2 pts

Excellent

Effort at this level evidences some mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"

20 pts

Quality of Post

Poor

Simple post that lacks insight, depth, or is superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding or evidence of having read the material
Marginal or N/A

Comments on target and reflect basic awareness of material. When personal opinion is shared, it is referenced to the readings.
Excellent

Post demonstrates understanding and synthesis of assigned reading material. Original thought and perspective brought to discussion through comments and additional questions regarding post. Enough detail is provided that teammates can in turn provide reflections to the post.
Timeliness of Post

(Due Tuesday, 9/23, 11:55pm)

Poor

Post is Late
Marginal or N/A

N/A
Excellent

Post submitted on time or early.
Length of Post

Target Post: (~125 +/- 25 words)

Poor

Too Brief or Too Wordy: Less than 100 or more than 150 words
Marginal or N/A

N/A
Excellent

Succinct: Between 100-150 words
Grammar/Mechanics

Applies to Part 2

Poor

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in multiple posts/replies. Written in language that is unclear or difficult to comprehend, using frequent abbreviations or "texting" style language.
Marginal or N/A

Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is clear with few abbreviations or "texting" style language.
Excellent

Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16