Skip to main content
iRubric: ART 101 - Museum Paper rubric

iRubric: ART 101 - Museum Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ART 101 - Museum Paper 
ART 100 - Research Paper
Art Research Paper on either an artist, style, movement or technique. Written in the Chicago format as an argumentative or compare and contrast.
Rubric Code: MXW57B7
By swilliams75
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
Museum Paper must be 3 pages in length and is a compare and contrast of 2 works of art you have seen in the museum or gallery ( you may also compare to a work we have discussed in class, but one work has to be from your visit). Please document works you are discussing by either photograph (if allowed, no flash) or image from the internet.
  Exceeds Expectations

150 pts

Compentent

130 pts

Proficient

110 pts

Novice

90 pts

Content
50 pts

Exceeds Expectations

- Subject matter is presented as an argument and accurately relates to the content of the paper.
- Ideas presented demonstrate strong engagement with the material.
- Provides abundant, accurate and convincing evidence in support of the thesis.
Compentent

- Topic is stated as an argument, but is somewhat unclear or unrepresentative of the overall content.
- Ideas presented demonstrate a familiarity with the material.
- Provides adequate evidence, but some of it is either incorrect or irrelevant.
Proficient

- The paper show direction but lacks a clear thesis statement or is not argumentative.
- Ideas presented demonstrate a misunderstanding of the material.
- Provides limited evidence or contains multiple errors.
Novice

- No clear direction dictates the content of the paper.
- Ideas presented are unrelated to the material.
- Lacks accurate evidence or fails to connect evidence to claims.
Organization
20 pts

Exceeds Expectations

- All art/info is fully identified in a natural and flowing manner.
- Images are provided where appropriate, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion brings the argument back to the claim in a meaningful way.
Compentent

- Most art is identified well, style may be distracting.
- Images are provided for the primary subject, cited in the text, and clearly labeled.
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion summarizes the claim.
Proficient

- Art identification is an issue that detracts from the paper.
- Images provided are unlabeled or not mentioned in the text.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
- The paper does show some consideration for how it ends.
Novice

- Art is unidentified to the extent that the works being discussed becomes unclear.
- Images are not provided or are irrelevant.
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are arbitrary, and lack clear thought.
- No conclusion present.
Research
40 pts

Exceeds Expectations

- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported by referenced sources
- Utilizes two scholarly sources
Compentent

- Major points are stated and sometimes supported by referenced sources
- Includes one scholarly source or two non-scholarly sources
Proficient

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported by referenced sources
- Only has non-scholarly sources cited
Novice

- Major points are not clear and /or unsupported.
- No sources cited
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
20 pts

Exceeds Expectations

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Writing style is professional and language is clear.
Compentent

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- The writing style is mostly professional and Language is understandable.
Proficient

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style is somewhat too casual or the language is confusing.
Novice

- Paper contains excessive grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- The writing style lacks refinement and the language is confusing.
Format and Length
20 pts

Exceeds Expectations

- Paper follows proper formatting and uses footnotes.
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Font and spacing fulfills requirements
Compentent

- Paper Mostly follows proper formatting and uses footnotes.
- Paper is at least a page under required length or exceeds the maximum length.
- Font or Spacing is moderately incorrect.
Proficient

- Paper follows a citation style with multiple errors.
- Paper length is inadequate in a way that distracts from the assignment.
- Numerous formatting issues
Novice

- Citations are not used in a meaningful way.
- Paper Length highly effects the usefulness of the assignment.
- Excessive formatting issues






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16