- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debates rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debates Rubric Code: K33685 By ASadovsky Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Federalist/Anti-Federalist Debates
	Factual Information & Clarity Main arguments and responses are outlined in a clear and orderly way and contain factual information. (N/A)	Use of Argument Reasons are given to support the resolution. (N/A)	Use of Cross-Examination and Rebutt Identification of weaknesses of opposing team's arguments and ability to defend itself against attack. (N/A)	Presentation Style Tone of voice, clarity of expression, precision of arguments all contribute to keeping audience's attention and persuading them of the team's case. (N/A)
Sophisticated 7.5+ pts.	Factual Information & Clarity Presentation reflects a complete and orderly presentation that represents understanding and usage of given source material.	Use of Argument Argument is strong and persuasive throughout presentation.	Use of Cross-Examination and Rebutt Excellent cross-examination and defense against opposing team's positions.	Presentation Style All style features were used convincingly.
Proficient 6-7 pts.	Factual Information & Clarity Presentation exhibits good use and understanding of given source material and organization is mostly clear and orderly.	Use of Argument Many good arguments with only minor problems evident.	Use of Cross-Examination and Rebutt Good cross-examination and rebuttals, with only minor problems in opposition and/or defense of position.	Presentation Style Most style features were used convincingly.
Marginal 5 pts.	Factual Information & Clarity Presentation exhibits a moderate understanding and usage of the given source material and some errors in organization.	Use of Argument Some decent arguments, but significant problems are evident.	Use of Cross-Examination and Rebutt Decent cross-examination and rebuttals, but some problems in opposing the opposition team's arguments and/or some problems in defending itself against opposition.	Presentation Style Few style features were used convincingly.
Beginning 1-4 pts.	Factual Information & Clarity Presentation reflects little knowledge and/or understanding of given source material. Work is also unclear and/or disorganized.	Use of Argument Few or no real arguments are given, or all arguments exhibit significant problems.	Use of Cross-Examination and Rebutt Poor cross-examination or rebuttals, failure to point out problems in opposing team's position or failure to defend itself against opposition.	Presentation Style Very few style features were used, none of them convincingly.