Skip to main content
iRubric: Assessment Rubrics for Theme reflection

iRubric: Assessment Rubrics for Theme reflection

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Assessment Rubrics for Theme reflection 
Assessment Rubrics for Unit and Theme reflection
This rubric has been developed to help students monitor their understandings and learning of History over a period of time. The main platform student uses is a Weblog
Rubric Code: J882AA
By huilin
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  The A post

exceeds the minimum standards

5 pts

The B post

meets the minimum standards adequately

4 pts

The C post

meets basic standard

3 pts

The D post

2 pts

The F post

does not meet the minimum department standards

1 pts

Thesis

The A post

Has a clear, well-developed thesis that addresses and evaluates the main question.
The B post

Has a clear thesis that addresses the main question.
The C post

Has a weak thesis that responds less adequately to the main question. Presents central idea in general terms. Thesis usually does not acknowledge other views.
The D post

Has a vague, poorly developed or only partially developed thesis.
The F post

Does not respond to the main question. Lacks a thesis or central argument, and simply restates the main question without evaluating it.
Argument

The A post

Supports the thesis with well-elaborated arguments.

Demonstrates exemplary understanding of the issue(s) at stake, identifying and addressing the key concepts or main ideas.

Appropriate application of concepts and historical understandings.

Acknowledges alternative perspectives and has provided at least 1 counter-argument.
The B post

Supports the thesis with arguments.

Demonstrates understanding of the issue(s) at stake, identifying and addressing some of the key concepts or main ideas.

Applies concepts and historical understandings correctly.
The C post

Arguments do not convincingly support thesis.

Shows basic comprehension of the issue(s) at stake, with lapses in understanding. Does not fully identify key concepts and ideas.

Applies some concepts and historical understandings incorrectly.
The D post

Arguments insufficiently address thesis.

Marginal or poor understanding of the issue(s) at stake, poorly or incorrectly identifying and addressing a key concept or main idea.

Many concepts and historical understandings applied incorrectly.
The F post

No attempt to develop the central argument.

Does not identify or address the key concepts or ideas.

No understanding of the presented issue(s).

Does not try to apply concepts or historical understandings.
Evidence and Examples

The A post

Substantiating the arguments with several examples.

Examples are pertinent, well-chosen, and free from factual error.

Clear links drawn between argument and evidence.
The B post

Substantiating some of the arguments with examples.

Examples are relevant and relatively free from factual errors.


Links drawn between argument and evidence.
The C post

Does not provide enough examples for the arguments.

There may be some factual inaccuracies.

Attempts to draw links between argument and evidence, but not executed well enough.
The D post

Providing irrelevant or ill-chosen examples.

Many factual errors.

Links between argument and evidence not drawn.
The F post

No attempt to substantiate arguments with examples.
Formating/ Grammer

The A post

Post is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
The B post

Post is over the appropriate length as described for the assignment.

Few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
The C post

Post is under appropriate length.
several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Language consistently lacks clarity, sentence structure may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing.
The D post

Post is significantly under appropriate length.

Many grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Reader unable to understand or see connections between thoughts.
The F post

Post is extremely under appropriate length.

Numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Impossible for the reader to follow thinking from sentence to sentence.



Keywords:
  • Reflection, Understanding, History



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98