Skip to main content
iRubric: Obj. 1.0-4.0 Design Team Model Rubric Optional: Competition

iRubric: Obj. 1.0-4.0 Design Team Model Rubric Optional: Competition

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Obj. 1.0-4.0 Design Team Model Rubric Optional: Competition 
Obj. 3.0 - Obj. 7.0 Design Team Diorama Competition
Each design team chooses ONE house style & theme. Ex: Block 1 chooses a Log cabin & rustic/mountain vacation lifestyle/theme. E&P of Design will used effectively in the house design. A TEAM label to convey the house style included. All phase of the Design Process are followed: programming, schematic design, development, contract docs, contract admin, & display (move in - post occupancy)
Rubric Code: CXBAWC7
By debrabell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Design Team Project
  Like Professional

5 pts

Lookin' Good

3 pts

< Satisfactory

1 pts

PHASE 1 Programming

Like Professional

PRE-DESIGN IS APPARENT. * NEEDS ARE DEVELOPED (FOR CLIENT).
"BRAINSTORMING"
"BUBBLE MAPPING" (for interior models)
(consideration of time frame & budget)
All CLASS design team members work effectively & efficiently to choose house style.
Include plot design for exterior shell models.
Creative ideas flow freely. Members pull from previous design styles learned. All team members on "same page" mind set.
Lookin' Good

PRE-DESIGN IS APPARENT *
NEEDS ARE DEVELOPED (FOR CLIENT)
"BRAINSTORMING"
"BUBBLE MAPPING" (for interior models)
(consideration of time frame & budget)
Ideas are satisfactory. May or may not pull from previous design styles learned.All Class Team members work in satisfactory manner to choose house style *. Include plot design for exterior shell models. Some team members may show reluctance or resistance in beginning.
< Satisfactory

PRE-DESIGN MAY NOT BE APPARENT *NEEDS ARE DEVELOPED (FOR CLIENT).
"BRAINSTORMING"
"BUBBLE MAPPING" (for interior models)
(consideration of time frame & budget)
Include plot design for exterior shell models.
Class Team members waste time in choosing house style.
Ideas are slow to come to discussion. Members may be distracted with their phones, etc. (not on task)
PHASE 2 Schematic Design

Like Professional

QUICK PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS
BUDGET PROJECTIONS & TIME LINE
Project manager is chosen and efficiently, with confidence, works to get team effort coordinated and organized.
A google doc is submitted with team members' names & their constructive contribution for initial start up.
Graphed exterior elevations on two sides and one rendering is required to be turned in by group.Drawn to 1/4" scale. use of graph paper & proper use of ruler/straight edge.
Lookin' Good

QUICK PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS
BUDGET PROJECTIONS & TIME LINE
Project Mgr. is chosen and works satisfactorily to get team effort coordinated and organized. Google doc submitted.
Graphed exterior elevations on two sides and one rendering is required to be turned in by group.
Eye-ball scale.
May use graph paper/grid though appears hurried and lacking preparation & time/ effort into it.
< Satisfactory

QUICK PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS
BUDGET PROJECTIONS & TIME LINE
Graphed exterior elevations on two sides and one rendering is required to be turned in by group. Definitely not drawn to scale.
Hand sketch -
Project Mgr is chosen & works to get team effort coordinated & organized. A lot of time wasted for a variety of reasons. Google doc submitted.
Difficulty in seeking consensus or getting off to a good start. "Start overs" are sluggish due to poor initial pro
PHASE 3 Design Development

Like Professional

REFINE DESIGN
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
APPROVAL OF SOLUTIONS
CLIENT REVIEW & APPROVAL
Coordinated and very effective effort & collaboration. Result: All on board.
Entire group shows enthusiasm and commitment.

Gen Mgr and team members communicate effectively and prob solve in superb manner. Listening, feedback, & problem solving is smooth & "forward thinking".
Steps are decided & followed smoothly. Structure is in process.
Lookin' Good

REFINE DESIGN
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
APPROVAL OF SOLUTIONS
CLIENT REVIEW & APPROVAL
Fair to good coordinated effort.
Most group members show positive commitment.
Project Mgr & team members (staff) communicate "okay" and come to resolution on most things.
Steps are decided & followed. Structure is in process.
< Satisfactory

REFINE DESIGN
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
APPROVAL OF SOLUTIONS
CLIENT REVIEW & APPROVAL
Turtle like effort. Some members are not taking project seriously.
Project Mgr and team members have difficulty working with each other/or team - for any # of reasons. Problems cont. Team member(s) do not accept their individual responsibility for the success of the group's effort.
Steps impeded in the development. Structure is very slow to develop.
PHASE 4 Contract docs

Like Professional

PREPARE FORMAL, STANDARD DRIVEN DOCS FOR CONSTRUCTION
Note: Group members are mutually responsible with safe and orderly use, and clean up of materials. Excellent care & attention to work environment.
An excellent example of a contract doc for this project is also presented.
Lookin' Good

PREPARE FORMAL, STANDARD DRIVEN DOCS FOR CONSTRUCTION
Foundation & materials are gathered satisfactorily but may not put this team 'ahead of the game'.
An example of a contract doc for this project is presented.
Note: Group members are responsible with safe and orderly use, and clean up of materials.Coordination of ideas and acquisition of materials falls to certain members.
< Satisfactory

PREPARE FORMAL, STANDARD DRIVEN DOCS FOR CONSTRUCTION
Coordinated effort and acquisition of materials is passive and ineffective.
An inadequate contract doc for the project is presented, or none exists.
Note: Group members are slow/slack with safe and orderly use, and clean up of materials.
PHASE 5 Contract Administration

Like Professional

COMPLETION OF PROJECT
DESIGNER CREATED PUNCH LISTS
Sign off on contract doc for project (all steps conducted in superior manner).
Students explore examples & streamline one to fit their task. (Students show initiative and ability to relate information on contract admin in real life).
Lookin' Good

COMPLETION OF PROJECT
DESIGNER CREATED PUNCH LISTS
Sign off on contract doc for project in good/fair manner).

Student show of initiative is good/fair when relating info to real life.
< Satisfactory

COMPLETION OF PROJECT
DESIGNER CREATED PUNCH LISTS
Sign off on contract doc for project - poor or non-existent.

Student show of initiative is < good/fair when relating info to real life.
PHASE 6 "DISPLAY"

Like Professional

SCHEDULE MOVE IN DATE or POST OCCUPANCY
EVALUATE CLIENT SATISFACTION
"BACK TO DRAWING BOARD" solutions dealt with in positive/adjusting manner.
Phase is represented in display of team's model.
Lookin' Good

SCHEDULED MOVE IN DATE or POST OCCUPANCY
EVALUATE CLIENT SATISFACTION
"BACK TO DRAWING BOARD" solutions dealt with.
Phase is represented in display of team's model.
< Satisfactory

SCHEDULED MOVE IN DATE or POST OCCUPANCY
EVALUATE CLIENT SATISFACTION
"BACK TO DRAWING BOARD" solutions met with < positive reactions/responses.
Phase is represented in display of team's model.
Application of E & P of Design

Like Professional

Very effective and realistic*

Reference Elements & Principles (rules) of Design*
Ex: If interior - wood floors laid "diagonally" to increase energy or to "draw the eye out" in family room. (purposeful use of diagonal line = element of line & principles of Rhythm used).
Lookin' Good

Effective.

Reference Elements & Principles (rules) of Design*
< Satisfactory

Not apparent or not very effective.

Reference Elements & Principles (rules) of Design
Project suggests team member(s) "winged it" rather than effectively using E & P of Design in thoughtful manner.
OVERALL QUALITY & REFLECTION

Like Professional

Superb craftsmanship - great quality high school level work.

DETAILED REFLECTION AT PROJECT COMPLETION IS SUBMITTED BY EACH TEAM MEMBER ON THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AS A TEAM & AS AN INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTOR/DESIGNER.

PICS of various stages of project are submitted into team's google doc.
Lookin' Good

Good quality high school level work.


DETAILED REFLECTION AT PROJECT COMPLETION IS SUBMITTED BY EACH TEAM MEMBER ON THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AS A TEAM & AS AN INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTOR/DESIGNER.

Pics of various stages of project are submitted into team's google doc.
< Satisfactory

Fair to poor quality high school level work.

DETAILED REFLECTION AT PROJECT COMPLETION IS SUBMITTED BY EACH TEAM MEMBER ON THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AS A TEAM & AS AN INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTOR/DESIGNER.

Pics of various stages of project are submitted into teams google doc.
Time Use * Display in Media Center

Like Professional

Effective use of time. Superb effort. READY.
All put finishing touches on project for display in Media Center which include info. sheet on Team members, their ideas, and contributions. Self-reflection of group type written in attractive display to accompany project. Top Notch High School Quality*
Lookin' Good

Effective use of time for the most part. Ready*
All put finishing touches on project for display in Media Center which include info. sheet on Team members, their ideas, and contributions. Self-reflection of group type written to accompany project. High School Quality*
< Satisfactory

What happened? Not ready. May not be put on display as decided by Project Mgr.
All put finishing touches on project for display in Media Center which include info. sheet on Team members, their ideas, and contributions (or lack of). Self-reflection of group type written to accompany project. "Elementary/Middle school" Quality



Keywords:
  • House & Room Design


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98