GregStemm's Website
Rubric
Provided here are some guidelines for assessment of the portfolio.
| Page | Unsatisfactory | Satisfactory | Exceeds expectations |
| Home Page | -Provides little to no information | -Provides details specifically listed in assignment | -Provides an interesting home page with a great amount of content |
| Personal Page | -nonexisting or minimal information | -Provides some information about the individual | -Provides detailed personal information that is relevant to |
| Artifact 1 | -Lacks required descriptions or links | -Includes link with minimal description, or item in original or near original form | -Includes link to page or text of work, with improvement from original form, and analysis of the work |
| Artifact 2 | -Lacks required descriptions or links | -Includes link with minimal description, or item in original or near original form | -Includes link to page or text of work, with improvement from original form, and analysis of the work |
| Artifact 3 | -Lacks required descriptions or links | -Includes link with minimal description, or item in original or near original form | -Includes link to page or text of work, with improvement from original form, and analysis of the work |
| Artifact 4 | -Lacks required descriptions or links | -Includes link with minimal description, or item in original or near original form | -Includes link to page or text of work, with improvement from original form, and analysis of the work |
| Reflection |
Each page is to be evaluated on a point scale from one to ten. Grading should be based on the following factors:
-Detail of information
-grammatical correctness
-success in addressing the page's purpose
-Overall effect of page
n98
