Skip to main content
iRubric: Analyzing A Social Issue Using Essential Questions - Video rubric

iRubric: Analyzing A Social Issue Using Essential Questions - Video rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analyzing A Social Issue Using Essential Questions - Video 
This rubric is for grading HSP students' Audio or Video assignment.
Rubric Code: Z58W66
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
100 %
  Substandard

2 pts

Poor

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

8 pts

Exceptional

10 pts

Content & Discussion
40 %

Argument clear and easy to follow. Prove thesis using examples. Integration of your own thinking and learning from the course.

Substandard

Words are actually used incorrectly at times.

No relationship of audio and/or video to the thesis.

Reasons for the argument are not stated, there are one or fewer examples that are NOT relevant AND/OR not explained.
Poor

Word choices too casual, or not effective in communicating precise details relating to the topic.

Relationship of audio and/or video to the thesis is not clearly evident.

Reasons for the argument are not stated, or there are obvious fallacies that contradict the details and examples. Perhaps the argument is an unsupported rant.
Fair

Word choices possibly too casual, or not effective in communicating precise details relating to the topic.

Relationship of audio and/or video to the thesis is somewhat evident.

Reasons for the argument are stated, but there are few concrete and specific details or examples to support the argument adequately or logically.
Good

Word choices are effective in communicating precise details relating to the topic.

Mostly focused audio and/or video relates to the thesis.

Reasons for the argument are stated and there are enough details and examples to support the argument adequately and logically.
Exceptional

Word choices are deliberate and professional. They contribute to the tone of the audio and/or video. The writer has put thought into using precise language to communicate meaning.

Clearly focused audio and/or video that relates to the thesis.

Reasons for the argument are clearly stated, and there are enough details to support the argument effectively and thoroughly. Concrete and specific examples are presented that effectively support and strengthen the argument.
Support: Requirements
20 %

Use resources specified, follow designated guidelines.

Substandard

Did not follow directions. Has none of the three of the following support items required in the assignment: (1) Reference to Toronto Star article, (2) Reference to the movie "Waiting for Superman", (3) Reference to Jean Anyon study on Social Class.
Poor

Has a minor reference to one out of three of the following support items required in the assignment: (1) Reference to Toronto Star article, (2) Reference to the movie "Waiting for Superman", (3) Reference to Jean Anyon study on Social Class.
Fair

Has one out of three of the following support items required in the assignment: (1) Reference to Toronto Star article, (2) Reference to the movie "Waiting for Superman", (3) Reference to Jean Anyon study on Social Class.
Good

Has two out of three of the following support items required in the assignment: (1) Reference to Toronto Star article, (2) Reference to the movie "Waiting for Superman", (3) Reference to Jean Anyon study on Social Class.
Exceptional

Has all three of the following support items required in the assignment: (1) Reference to Toronto Star article, (2) Reference to the movie "Waiting for Superman", (3) Reference to Jean Anyon study on Social Class.
Organization & Structure
20 %

Introduction: Clear thesis, plan, position.

Each point can be readily tied to the previous one and the overall argument.

End of Audio/Video: Restate argument, valid reasons.

Substandard

Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.

No focus. Few creative aspects that distract the viewer from the stated purpose of the presentation.

Awkward transitions. No flow to the audio and/or video.

Structure detracts from the message.

Audio and/or video is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
Poor

Opening does not include a thesis statement.

Weak focus. May contain creative aspects but those
aspects tend to distract the viewer from the stated purpose of the presentation.

Several awkward transitions disrupt the flow of the presentation.

Information in the
assignment is disorganized,
and not logically or
effectively structured. Major points are not previewed.

Audio and/or video is not well-constructed.

The end of the audio and
Fair

Opening states the question/topic and your position but does not preview all major points.

Focus maintained but it may not be compelling or presented in a way that consistently keeps audience’s attention.

Audio and/or video mostly flows from scene to scene; there may be a couple of awkward transitions. Perhaps unsure of purpose of a given clip.

The end of the audio and/or video summarizes the argument based on the thesis, but it offers little to no additional support
Good

Opening states the question/topic, your position, and your plan for the audio and/or video.

Balanced, attractive, easy to follow, and keeps an audience's attention.

Audio and/or video mostly flows from scene to scene seamlessly. No lengthy monologues to distract the audience.


The end of the audio and/or video restates the argument based on the thesis statement. It also gives valid and logical reasons that support the argument.
Exceptional

Opening states the question/topic, your position, and your plan for the audio and/or video clearly and strongly.

The final product is unique, powerful, effective, and compels the audience's attention.

Audio and/or video flows from scene to scene seamlessly. No lengthy monologues to distract the audience.

The end of the audio and/or video clearly and effectively restates the argument and gives valid reasons in support of the argument.
Creativity & Technology
10 %

"Creative Element" in Audio/Video means high quality sound/shots, smooth edits and transitions. Language is appropriate for the audio/video's overall style.

Substandard

The audio and/or video is unedited and many poor shots remain. No transitions between clips are used.

Little mastery of
mechanics. Numerous errors in
spelling and grammar severely interfere with
meaning and language uses jargon, cliches, or conversational tone.
Poor

The audio and/or video is edited in a few spots. Several poor shots remain. Transitions from shot to shot are choppy, and the types of wipes and fades selected are not always appropriate for the scene. There are many unnatural breaks and/or early cuts.

Little mastery of
mechanics. Numerous errors in
grammar (more than 10 errors) greatly interfere with
meaning and language is mostly informal, non-academic style (colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
Fair

The audio and/or video is mostly edited throughout with mostly quality shots remaining. Some transitions are used. Good pacing and timing.

Average mastery of
mechanics. Although
errors in grammar (6-10 errors) are evident, the meaning mostly remains
clear and the language is mostly in appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
Good

The audio and/or video is edited throughout with only quality shots remaining. A variety of transitions are used. Good pacing and timing.

Above average
mastery of mechanics. Grammar errors are minor (3-6 errors) and do not interfere with meaning and the language is mostly in appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
Exceptional

The audio and/or video is edited with only high quality shots remaining. Video moves smoothly from shot to shot. A variety of transitions are used to assist in communicating the main idea and smooth the flow from one scene to the next. Shots and scenes flow seamlessly. Digital effects are used appropriately for emphasis.

Excellent mastery of
mechanics. Grammar is correct (2-3 errors) and the language is appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
References Page
10 %

APA Format.

Substandard

Missing references page.
Poor

Does not follow APA rules for references page.
Fair

Follows some APA rules for references page with 5-8 errors in citation format.
Good

Follows most APA rules for teferences page with 3 - 5 errors in citation format.
Exceptional

Follows all APA rules for references page with no more than 3 errors in citation format.



Keywords:
  • Writing, Sociology, Education, Social Issues







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16