iRubric: Draft 1 Fall 2015 Relief Printmaking rubric

-The sketches and final work clearly demonstrate a personal vision, individual mark-making, and innovative ideas and/or risk-
taking.
-The work demonstrates a distinct integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.

- The sketches and final work generally demonstrate original and innovative ideas, with some personalization.
-The work demonstrates a general integration of the printmaking technique and the project concept.

- The sketches and final work demonstrates little originality, or attempts at innovation
with materials and techniques seem to be emerging.
-The work demonstrates limited integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

- An idea behind the work is presented, but the ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely
mostly on appropriation.
- The work demonstrates limited signs integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

- An idea behind the work may be presented, but the work comprises trite or simplistic
solutions that are poorly executed.
- The work does not demonstrate any integration of the printmaking technique and the student's concept.

-The work is technically excellent. All 5 prints are turned in and all 5 are of excellent quality.
- All parts of the image and the edges of the block are crisp and clear.
- Borders are clean and registration is identical.
- Curation is invisible.
- All of the prints are titled, signed/dated, and numbered in pencil.

-The work is technically strong. All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. 4 or more of the prints are of very good quality.
- All of the prints are titled, signed/dated, and numbered in pencil.
- The image and the edges of the block are crisp and clear.
- Borders are clean and registration is identical on at least 4.
- Curation is somewhat invisible.

-The work demonstrates developing technical competence and use of materials and media.
- All 5 prints in the edition are turned in. 3 or more of the prints are good quality with even coverage and crisp edges.
- There is some variation in inking and/or registration.
- Prints could benefit from curation.
- Prints are lacking one of the following: titled, signed/dated, numbered, in pencil.

- The work demonstrates marginal technical competence.
- Inking is not consistent, registration is inconsistent (3+) and prints may have stray marks or fingerprints.
- Automatic if 4 or fewer prints turned in.
- Prints are lacking more than one of the following: titled, signed/dated, numbered, in pencil.

-The work is generally inept; use of materials and media lacks skill or technical
competence.
- The prints are messy, damaged or smeared.
- Automatic if 3 or fewer prints turned in.

- The student is almost always on task in the studio, follows the directions for the project the first time they are given, and cleans up their work area in a timely fashion.
- The student consistently respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student consistently offers constructive critiques.

The student is sometimes off task, but follows directions for the project, and cleans up his/her work area in a timely fashion.
- The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student usually offers constructive critiques.

The student's participation does not reflect one of the following: being on task, following directions for the project, and cleaning up his/her work area in a timely fashion.
- The student generally respects classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student usually offers constructive critiques.

- The student is frequently off task in the studio, may not follow directions, or delays cleanup.
- The student sometimes shows respect for classmates.
-The student rarely offers constructive critiques.

- The student does not follow directions, or refuses to participate in the project fully.
- Student may misuse, waste or destroy art materials carelessly.
- Student may leave a mess.
- The student may rarely show respect for classmates, as demonstrated though actions and words.
-The student offers destructive critique or does not participate in critiques.