- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Educreations: Primary and Secondary Source Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Educreations: Primary and Secondary Source Analysis Rubric Code: QX28ACA By esiarny Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Primary Source Analysis
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Description of Source	Poor Includes: Author Date *Summary of document Discussion is limited or lacking. Simply stating the items. Language is not sophisticated.	Fair Includes: Author Date *Summary of document Discussion is strong and the items are linked together. Relationships are drawn between date, author and the message of the document.	Good Includes: Author Date Summary of document Discussion is strong and the items are linked together. Relationships are drawn between date, author and the message of the document. In addition, some of these might be included: Author's point of view historical context around the date Summary goes above and beyond
Analysis of Source	Poor Includes: Uses of little evidence from the text analysis does not fully explain answers to your questions and/or does not relate it back to specific evidence from the text *uses 1 secondary source to help answer your questions and the document	Fair Includes: Use of evidence from the text analysis explains answers to your questions analysis relates back to specific evidence from the text uses at least 1 secondary source to help answer your questions and the document	Good Includes: Use of evidence from the text analysis thoroughly explains answers to your questions analysis relates back to specific evidence from the text analysis is insightful and original analysis takes into account historical context or events uses at least 2 secondary sources to help answer your questions and the document
Questions Asked	Poor 5 questions identified about the primary source. At least 3 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 1 question requires outside research	Fair 5 or 6 questions identified about the primary source. At least 4 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 2 question requires outside research	Good 6 or more questions identified about the primary source. At least 4 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 3 question requires outside research
Educreations Formatting	Poor Does not include at least 1 of the following: clear audio clear and legible annotations *is far over or far under an appropriate length (2-3 minutes)	Fair N/A	Good Includes: clear audio clear and legible annotations *is an appropriate length (2-3 minutes)

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More History rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n16

Primary Source Analysis
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Description of Source	Poor Includes: Author Date *Summary of document Discussion is limited or lacking. Simply stating the items. Language is not sophisticated.	Fair Includes: Author Date *Summary of document Discussion is strong and the items are linked together. Relationships are drawn between date, author and the message of the document.	Good Includes: Author Date Summary of document Discussion is strong and the items are linked together. Relationships are drawn between date, author and the message of the document. In addition, some of these might be included: Author's point of view historical context around the date Summary goes above and beyond
Analysis of Source	Poor Includes: Uses of little evidence from the text analysis does not fully explain answers to your questions and/or does not relate it back to specific evidence from the text *uses 1 secondary source to help answer your questions and the document	Fair Includes: Use of evidence from the text analysis explains answers to your questions analysis relates back to specific evidence from the text uses at least 1 secondary source to help answer your questions and the document	Good Includes: Use of evidence from the text analysis thoroughly explains answers to your questions analysis relates back to specific evidence from the text analysis is insightful and original analysis takes into account historical context or events uses at least 2 secondary sources to help answer your questions and the document
Questions Asked	Poor 5 questions identified about the primary source. At least 3 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 1 question requires outside research	Fair 5 or 6 questions identified about the primary source. At least 4 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 2 question requires outside research	Good 6 or more questions identified about the primary source. At least 4 questions are analytical or require critical thinking *At least 3 question requires outside research
Educreations Formatting	Poor Does not include at least 1 of the following: clear audio clear and legible annotations *is far over or far under an appropriate length (2-3 minutes)	Fair N/A	Good Includes: clear audio clear and legible annotations *is an appropriate length (2-3 minutes)