- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ARTICLE REVIEW: SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ARTICLE REVIEW: SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE ARTICLE REVIEW: SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE A one page summary and critique of an article concerning Using the example rubric for article critiques as a guide and this area specific grades rubric, provide a critical review of the article and illustrate how the article supports the course learning outcomes. Your critique should demonstrate critical thinking and a comprehensive analysis of the article. Rubric Code: NX2C249 By dawhite Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Article Citation	Poor No citation has been included.	Fair Citation has been included, but is unclear.	Good Formal citation has been stated.
Article Submission	Poor Article not submitted with the assignment.	Fair	Good Article submitted with the assignment.
Introduction	Poor No introduction.	Fair The introduction stated whether the writer agreed or disagreed, but did not state the confirming/opposing argument demonstrated in the article	Good The student has identified the overall purpose of the article in a well-conceived topic sentence.
Summary of Article	Poor The student's understanding of the article is incomplete or has so many misconceptions that the student cannot be said to understand the topic.	Fair The student has a complete understanding of the information in the article that is important but has not included some of the key points and/or supporting details.	Good The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the article. Has highlighted key points and appropriate supporting details.
Critique of Article	Poor The student does not construct a clear judgement about the article, or constructs one that is not at all supported by the specifics submitted.	Fair The student constructs a judgement about the article that has some relationship to the specifics, but the specifics do not totally support the generalization.	Good The student constructs a valid judgment about the article and clearly explains, based on specifics (content, conclusions, etc.) identified from the article.
Written Communication	Poor The submitted assignment demonstrates little or no attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).	Fair The submitted assignment demonstrates some attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).	Good The student uses all necessary conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, organization) with few errors.
Length	Poor The student wrote 1 paragraph.	Fair The student wrote two paragraphs but they were not 5-7 complete sentences each.	Good The student wrote 2 paragraphs, 5-7 complete sentences each.