Skip to main content
iRubric: CLSC 200: Online Social Engagement Project Assignment rubric

iRubric: CLSC 200: Online Social Engagement Project Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CLSC 200: Online Social Engagement Project Assignment 
For this assignment, the major project of the class, you will create an active online social media experience that engages the public on an issue of social justice. If project is completed in a group, you will work with the instructor to indicate how each person was involved in the overall outcomes and how their skills and knowledge will be evaluated.
Rubric Code: NX25AA6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Project
100 % = 20% of final grade overall.
  Excellent

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

Mechanics
30 %
Project delivery
33.33 %

Excellent

Student followed instructions for this assignment.

Project was submitted on or before the due date. In rare cases, a student may receive permission to submit late without losing marks.
Good

Student followed most of the instructions for this assignment.

Project was submitted late, without reason or permission.
Fair

Student followed some of the instructions for this assignment.

Project may have been submitted late, without reason or permission.
Poor

Student did not follow the instructions for this assignment.

Project was submitted significantly late, without reason or permission.
Mechanics of writing
33.33 %

Excellent

There are no spelling or grammatical errors.
Good

There are few spelling or grammatical errors.
Fair

Text is comprehensible with some errors.
Poor

There are many spelling and grammatical errors.
Use of tools
33.33 %

Excellent

Project demonstrates effective networking between two or more digital social engagement tools.
Good

Project demonstrates ongoing networking between two or more digital social engagement tools.
Fair

Two or more digital social engagement tools are used.
Poor

Project does not demonstrate effective networking between two or more digital social engagement tools.
Content
60 %
Organization of information
20 %

Excellent

User is able to navigate and understand how information is organized.

Links work.

Titles and headings are effective.
Good

User is mostly able to navigate and understand how information is organized.

No more than one or two links do not work as expected.

There are minimal issues with titles and headings.
Fair

User is somewhat able to navigate and understand how information is organized.

Links are present.
Poor

User is unable to find information or understand how information is organized.

A large number of links are broken.

Titles and headings do not provide effective guidance.
Knowledge and use of class material
20 %

Excellent

Student's knowledge is strongly demonstrated through this project.

Comprehension of class materials and subject matter is clearly reflected in the project.

Supporting facts are frequently provided and referenced in all cases.

Additional resources are provided.
Good

Student's knowledge is demonstrated through this project.

Comprehension of class materials and subject matter is reflected in the project.

Supporting facts are provided and/or referenced in most cases.

Some additional resources are provided.
Fair

Student's knowledge is somewhat demonstrated through this project.

Comprehension of class materials and subject matter is somewhat reflected in the project.

Supporting facts are occasionally provided and/or referenced in some cases.

A few additional resources are provided.
Poor

Student's knowledge is not demonstrated through this project.

Comprehension of class materials and subject matter is not reflected in the project.

Supporting facts are not provided and/or referenced in most cases.

No additional resources are provide.
Content quality
20 %

Excellent

Content is interesting and engaging.The material is original and demonstrates strong critical thinking skills.
Good

Content is moderately interesting and engaging. Most of the material is original and demonstrates critical thinking skills.
Fair

Content is somewhat interesting and engaging. Some of the material is original and demonstrates critical thinking skills.
Poor

Content is not engaging or interesting. The material is not original and does not demonstrate critical thinking skills.
Visual impact
20 %

Excellent

Visuals are engaging, relevant and impactful.

Text is easy to read.

Overall visual design is appropriate to the content.

There is clear evidence that the visual elements were designed specifically for the target audience.
Good

Visuals are minimal but relevant and somewhat impactful.

Text is relatively easy to read.

Visual design relates to the content

Visual elements are moderately tailored to the target audience.
Fair

Visuals are minimal.

Text is readable.

Visual design exists.

Visual elements are present.
Poor

No visuals are used.

Text is difficult to read.

Visual design does not appeal to the target audience.

Visual elements do not represent the content of the material.
Use of specific elements
20 %

Excellent

Relevant available elements are used to full effect (ie. widgets, design elements).
Good

Relevant available elements are used to good effect.
Fair

Relevant available elements are used to fair effect.
Poor

Relevant available elements are not used effectively.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16