Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER VERSION 2 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER VERSION 2
POSITION PAPER ON AN ISSUE
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER VERSION 2
Rubric Code:
L5X442
By
uclasom
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
POSITION PAPER
10 %
OUTSTANDING
10 pts
STRONG
8 pts
ADEQUATE
6 pts
LIMITED
4 pts
DEFICIENT
2 pts
MISSING
0 pts
INTRODUCTION OF PROBLEM
OUTSTANDING
Importance of specific topic is stated. Definition of key terms present. Key stakeholders and key policy areas needing analysis and resolution are presented.
STRONG
Presents a well-considered position on the issue.
ADEQUATE
Presents a clear position on the issue.
LIMITED
Presents a vague or limited position on the issue.
DEFICIENT
Is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue.
MISSING
Missing
ISSUE STATEMENT
OUTSTANDING
Evaluative review of the literature about the topic, including print and electronic sources. Existing policy related to the topic. The most important legislative, judicial, and regulatory policy instruments. Ambiguities, conflicts, problems, and contradictions related to the instruments
STRONG
Develops the position with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples.
ADEQUATE
Develops the position with relevant reasons and/or examples.
LIMITED
Is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples.
DEFICIENT
Provides few, if any,relevant reasons or examples.
MISSING
Missing
POLICY ALTERNATIVES
OUTSTANDING
Underlying assumptions. Effects on and roles of key stakeholders. Conflicts among key values. Implications of issues
STRONG
Is focused and generally well-organized, connecting ideas appropriately.
ADEQUATE
Is adequately focused and organized.
LIMITED
Is poorly focused and/or poorly-organized.
DEFICIENT
Is unfocused and/or disorganized.
MISSING
Missing
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
OUTSTANDING
Recommendations. Rationale for recommendations. Implications and possible outcomes of specific courses of action
STRONG
Expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety.
ADEQUATE
Expresses ideas with reasonable clarity.
LIMITED
Has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity.
DEFICIENT
Has serious problems in the use of language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning.
MISSING
Missing
THESIS STATEMENT
OUTSTANDING
Thesis Statement is one grammatically correct sentence, which is revealing and provides an excellent roadmap to the whole paper.
STRONG
ADEQUATE
LIMITED
DEFICIENT
MISSING
Missing
TOPIC SENTENCES
OUTSTANDING
The topic sentences assert ideas to support the thesis statement. When reading only the thesis statement and the subsequent topic sentences, the paper makes logic sense.
STRONG
ADEQUATE
LIMITED
DEFICIENT
MISSING
Missing
EVIDENCE AND SUPPORT
OUTSTANDING
Each assertion is supported with researchable and verifiable support from reputable sources. Each paragraph should have 4 supporting evidence.
STRONG
ADEQUATE
LIMITED
DEFICIENT
MISSING
Missing
GRAMMAR
OUTSTANDING
Demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors.
STRONG
Demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors.
ADEQUATE
Generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors.
LIMITED
Contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning.
DEFICIENT
Contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning.
MISSING
Missing
INTEGRATION OF SOURCES
OUTSTANDING
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and are cited (Author, Year) within the text of the paper.
STRONG
ADEQUATE
LIMITED
DEFICIENT
MISSING
Missing
NUMBER OF SOURCES
OUTSTANDING
Paper uses at least 5 Scholarly Sources.
STRONG
ADEQUATE
LIMITED
DEFICIENT
MISSING
Missing
Subjects:
English
Political Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.