Skip to main content
iRubric: Compare/Contrast Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Compare/Contrast Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Compare/Contrast Analysis Rubric 
Response to Literature
Students respond analytically to literary text.
Rubric Code: KX3BW4A
By crafferty12
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Responding Analytically
  Surpassing Standards

5 pts

Meeting Standards

4 pts

Approaching Standards

3 pts

Emerging

2 pts

Not Meeting Standards

1 pts

Establishing Claim/ Assertion

Surpassing Standards

Develops interpretations that are thoughtful. Comprehensive grasp of the text. Accurate and coherent interpretations around clear ideas, premises, or images from a literary text.
Meeting Standards

Develops interpretations that demonstrate an adequate grasp of the text. Organizes accurate and reasonably coherent interpretations around clear ideas, premises, or images from a literary work.
Approaching Standards

Develops interpretations that demonstrate a limited grasp of the text. Includes interpretations that lack accuracy or coherence as related to ideas, premises or images from the literary work.
Emerging

Develops interpretations that demonstrate a limited grasp of the text. Includes interpretations that lack accuracy or coherence as related to ideas, premises or images from the literary work.
Not Meeting Standards

Did not attempt or demonstrates little grasp of task. Lacks an interpretation or may be a simple retelling of the text. Lacks textual examples.
Use of Evidence

Surpassing Standards

Provides clear and thorough textual examples and details to support interpretations. Uses appropriate MLA citation.
Meeting Standards

Provides textual examples and details to support interpretations. Uses appropriate MLA citation.
Approaching Standards

Provides few, if any, textual examples and details to support the interpretations. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Emerging

Provides few, if any, textual examples and details. The examples and details do not clearly support the interpretations. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Not Meeting Standards

Lacks textual examples. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Demonstrates Critical Thinking

Surpassing Standards

Effectively and insightfully connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective.
Meeting Standards

Connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective.
Approaching Standards

Connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective, but analysis may be inaccurate or incomplete.
Emerging

Superficial connections of the text to prior knowledge, other texts or broader world of ideas. Ineffectively advances or fails to identify relevant themes of perspective.
Not Meeting Standards

No attempt to connect the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas. Fails to identify and advance relevant themes of perspective.
Format

Surpassing Standards

Length is more than 2 pages. Completes paper with proper formatting including 12 pt ft, Times New Roman font, double spaced, and appropriate heading.
Meeting Standards

Length is at least two pages. Completes paper with most of the proper formatting including 12 pt ft, Times New Roman font, double spaced, and appropriate heading.
Approaching Standards

Length is close to two pages. Does not complete paper with proper formatting including 12 pt ft, Times New Roman font, double spaced, and appropriate heading.
Emerging

Length is not appropriate and is not completed
Not Meeting Standards

Length is not appropriate and the format is not as instructed.
Grammar/Spelling

Surpassing Standards

Clean and free of spelling and grammatical errors and presents complex use of grammar and vocabulary.
Meeting Standards

0-1 spelling and grammatical errors.
Approaching Standards

2-3 spelling and grammatical errors.
Emerging

Many spelling and grammatical errors.
Not Meeting Standards

Most sentences need revision, so that errors interfere with understanding of the text.



Keywords:
  • Literature, analysis, reading



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98