- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Genetic Engineering Debate and Essay rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Genetic Engineering Debate and Essay rubric Rubric for Unit plan 2 on Human Genetic Engineering Rubric Code: D4A69B By murphygj Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Assignment Grade Levels: 9-12

Genetic Engineering Debate and Essa
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Title, Name, Date	Poor Full name missing, date missing no title	Fair Full name missing, title present, no date	Good Full name, title and date all are present	Excellent Full name, interesting title,and date present
Pro arguments stated clearly	Poor Only one argument presented for position and stated fairly clearly	Fair Two Pros and two cons stated clearly	Good Three to five pros and cons are stated clearly with expansion of one strong argument for or against	Excellent Six or more pros and cons stated clearly with expansion of two or more strongest arguments for or against
Logic used	Poor Not clear what the line of logic presented	Fair fairly clear line of logic used with example to support	Good clear logic present with two examples showing support for your position	Excellent clear logic present with three or more examples showing strong support for your position
Readable	Poor Not typed and barely legible	Fair Not typed better very legible.	Good Typed with only a few minor errors	Excellent Typed with only one minor
Grammar	Poor Sentence structure needed to comprehend	Fair Good sentence structure and thoughts written	Good Very good sentence structure and punctuation only one or two minor errors	Excellent No evident probelms with sentence structure or communication of thopughts and no errors in punctuation or grammar
Technical Terminology Usage	Poor No clear use of scientific terms used	Fair One or two science terms used appropriately	Good Three or four scientific terms used appropriately	Excellent Five or more scientific terms related to DNA genetics were used approriately
Participation in group debate	Poor Spoke briefly to group but not to class	Fair Spoke at least one point clearly to class or group.	Good Spoke at least two points with good eveidence to support position	Excellent Spoke at least three points with good evidence or exam[ples to show support and argued clearly against opposing views offering consideration of opposing views