Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Human Impact - Oceans and Seas rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Human Impact - Oceans and Seas
Problems and Reasons in Mexico City
Students in groups will research and report on the impact of a human activity on the oceans and seas of Australia or the Asia Pacific region including the facts, reasons, solutions and future trends. Presented as a mind map on a large poster
Rubric Code:
B4XA83
By
evieo8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Human Impact on the oceans and seas
Excellent
5 pts
Very Good
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Not satisfactory
1 pts
Not shown
0 pts
FACTS
Excellent
The information is accurate and presents a complete picture of the issue. The group took the time to research and summarise information from a wide range of sources. More than 8 facts presented. Facts are interesting and varied.
Very Good
The facts presented are accurate and cover the main issues. 7-8 facts are given using a range of sources.
Good
The facts presented are accurate and partially cover the main issues. 5 - 6 facts given coming from a range of sources.
Needs Improvement
The facts presented are accurate but do not cover the main issues. 3 - 4 facts given. Only 1 or 2 sources used.
Not satisfactory
The facts presented are inaccurate, rudimentary or do not make sense. Less than 3 facts given. They come from only one source or sources are not identified.
Not shown
No facts presented
REASONS
Excellent
The information presents a detailed explanation of both direct and indirect reasons for the situation. Linkages between reasons show the complexity of the siutation. Social, economic, cultural and environmental aspects are shown.
Very Good
The reasons presented are accurate and cover the main points in some detail. Linkages are shown.
Reasons cover at least three aspects of the situation (social, environmental, cultural, economic)
Good
The reasons presented are accurate and partially cover the main points. Linkages between reasons are shown, but in a simplistic way. Reasons cover two or three aspects of the situation (social, environmental, cultural, economic)
Needs Improvement
The reasons presented are accurate but limited. Linkages between reasons are rudimentary.
Reasons cover one or two of aspects of the situation ( social, environmental, cultural, economic)
Not satisfactory
The reasons presented are inaccurate, rudimentary or do not make sense. No linkages between reasons shown. Reasons only cover one of aspects of the situation ( social, environmental, cultural, economic)
Not shown
No reasons given
SOLUTIONS
Excellent
Solutions researched cover a wide range of topics eg direct action, laws, regulations, policies, education etc. Students also suggest thier own innovative or novel solutions to deal with the complexity of the issue. Good linkages between solutions, facts and reasons are shown
Very Good
The group has listed 3 solutions discovered from thier research which cover a range of topics. Good level of detail about these solutions provided. Two or more extra group solutions suggested which are well linked to facts and reasons.
Good
The group has listed 2 or 3 solutions discovered from thier research. Good detail about these solutions provided. One or two extra group solutions suggested. Some solutions are linked to facts and reasons but not all.
Needs Improvement
The group has listed 2 solutions discovered from thier research. Low level of detail about these solutions provided. One extra solutions suggested from the groups opinion. Solutions are linked to either a fact or a reason.
Not satisfactory
The group has listed only one solution discovered from thier research. Low level of detail about this solution provided. No group solutions suggested. Solutions are not linked to facts or reasons.
Not shown
No solutions included
FUTURE
Excellent
Students have analysed trends relating to the situation and presented a well thought out opinion about what might happen in the future if trends continue. Future and trends are linked strongly to facts, reasons, solutions. More than one possibility presented.
Very Good
Future scenario included which covers more than one possibility. Links to trends, facts, reasons and solutions included and satisfactorily established/ researched.
Good
Future scenario included which covers more than one possibility. Links to trends, facts, reasons and solutions included but not well established/ researched.
Needs Improvement
One future scenario included which is partially linked to facts, reasons or solutions. Linkages present but not well established/ researched.
Not satisfactory
Future scenario included but is not linked well to trends, facts, reasons and solutions and lacks detail and thought.
Not shown
No future scenario included.
ILLUSTRATIONS
Excellent
5+ illustrations included which are clear, detailed, diverse ( eg graph, map, photo, sketch) well labelled and linked well to the text.
Very Good
4 - 5 illustration included that are well linked to text, labelled and cover at least 3 different types.
Good
3 - 4 illustration included that are well linked to text, labelled and cover at least two different types.
Needs Improvement
2-3 illustration included that are well linked to text or well labelled or diverse in thier type (graph, map, photo etc)
Not satisfactory
1 -2 illustrations included which are not linked well to text, poorly labelled and of only one type ( eg photos)
Not shown
No illustrations included
PRESENTATION
Excellent
The concept map is neat and clear. There are no spelling errors. It looks like the group's best effort. It is presented with good detail, colour, line work and creativity.
Very Good
The concept map is easy to read and looks like the group put their best effort into it. There are very few spelling errors. More colour and better line work could be used.
Good
The concept map is easy to read but more effort could have been put into the layout and detail. There are a few spelling errors. More colour and better line work could be used.
Needs Improvement
The map looks complete but has spelling errors and is messy. Some colour is used but lines are not well drawn.
Not satisfactory
The concept map is hard to read and looks incomplete. There are many spelling errors, little colour and it is very messy.
Not shown
N/A
TEAM USE OF CLASS TIME
Excellent
Students have stayed on task, used all available resources, assisted others, asked relevant questions, participated in group and class discussions, and followed instructions well. The team has functioned very cooperatively.
Very Good
Students have used class time and available resources productively and have not distracted others. The team has task shared well, but there is little evidence of information sharing assisting other team members or learning through team discussion.
Good
Students have used most of their class time and resources productively. Short periods of off task behaviour have been halted with teacher prompting. The team has shared out tasks but not worked cooperatively to solve problems or share information to improve thier project.
Needs Improvement
Students have worked well at times but also were distracted, off task or disruptive at times. The team has not functioned well for at least half of the time - with uncooperative behaviour or unresolved disagreements. Internet and library time has not been well used.
Not satisfactory
Students have not used class time well evidenced by high proportion of time spent off task, distracting others or inefficiently using the internet and library. Students have not listened to or followed instructions. Team has not worked cooperatively.
Not shown
Project not completed in the time available
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Excellent
Includes are wide range of references (7+) . Shows that students have taken the time to research the topic thoroughly looking at diverse points of view and using different forms of information (internet, books, news papers, pers comm etc)
Very Good
6 - 7 references listed covering at least 2 types of information (internet, book, newspaper, pers comm etc)
Good
4-5 references listed but mainly covering two types (internet, book, newspaper, pers comm etc)
Needs Improvement
3 -4 references listed but mainly of one type eg internet.
Not satisfactory
1 - 2 references shown and/ or incorrect references listed.
Not shown
No Bibliography included
Self assessment
Excellent
Submitted
Very Good
N/A
Good
N/A
Needs Improvement
N/A
Not satisfactory
N/A
Not shown
Not submitted
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.