- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Interpersonal reflection rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Interpersonal reflection Interpersonal reflection Write a reflection on your own communication approach, using a specific encounter as an example. Rubric Code: WCC454 By tpruett Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Communication Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Interpersonal reflection
	Excellent 4 pts	Adequate 3 pts	Emerging 2 pts	Needs Attention 1 pts
Situation	Excellent The situation is well-chosen, and carefully and vividly described. The story of the event is well-told.	Adequate You describe the situation and the event sufficiently for the reader to understand the issues and problems.	Emerging The situation is at least sketched out for the reader. The description of the encounter is vague, or seems to be missing parts, or is confusing.	Needs Attention Parts are missing, or else delivered in such a generic way as to not seem to be about a specific event.
Self	Excellent You reflect insightfully on your role and performance in the situation, revealing the nature of your participation.	Adequate You show awareness of your strengths and weaknesses.	Emerging You are able to show at least some self-awareness of yourself in the situation.	Needs Attention You deliver no real insight into your behavior or motivations. You do not seem to evaluate your performance.
Theory	Excellent Document uses ideas from class or the text to deliver insight into the encounter.	Adequate Document uses ideas from class or the text to describe communication during the encounter.	Emerging Document is inconsistent in using ideas from the class or text, or somehow misunderstands those ideas.	Needs Attention Document makes no use of communication theory.
Mechanics	Excellent No appreciable errors in grammar, spelling, or sentence and paragraph construction. The organization is compelling, and leads the reader clearly along.	Adequate Any errors do not interfere with communication or damage author's credibility. May have small problems, e.g., with word choice, but the document remains easy to understand. The organization is clear.	Emerging Document has errors that damage the author's credibility: noticeable violations of grammar, punctuation, and spelling conventions. Poor or even insulting word choices. The organization hinders comprehension, or is confusing.	Needs Attention Document is hard to understand due to errors in construction and mechanics. The paper is not organized in any decipherable way.