Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Excellent Scientists! rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Excellent Scientists!
Excellent Scientists!
Students will research scientists that made significant impacts in the world. Students will be assigned a scientist and given time to research the contributions of their scientist as well as their scientist’s biographical information. The students will then complete items to display their gathered information through a tri-fold display board for the science fair.
Rubric Code:
NX662XA
By
tlancaster86
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Which Scientist Am I Like? iMovie
Exemplary
20 pts
Proficient
15 pts
Acceptable
10 pts
Needs Improvement
5 pts
Scientist's Contributions
Exemplary
The scientific contribution is clearly stated, described with correct grammar, and elaboration of the steps, or previous achievements that led up to the major achievement were discussed thoroughly.
Proficient
The scientific contribution is clearly stated and described with somewhat correct grammar, or previous achievements that led up to the major achievement were not discussed thoroughly.
Acceptable
The scientific contribution is somewhat stated and/or described with grammar mistakes, or previous achievements that led up to the major achievement were not discussed.
Needs Improvement
No scientific contribution was detailed with grammar mistakes.
Biographical Information
Exemplary
All listed biographical information is included;
Name of scientist
Life Span; what led them into their field; What research or discoveries they made,
etc.
Proficient
1 of the listed biographical information is included;
Name of scientist
Life Span
what led them into their field
Acceptable
2 of the listed biographical information is missing;
Name of scientist
Life Span
what led them into their field
Needs Improvement
3 or more of the listed biographical information are missing;
Name of Scientist
Life Span
Field of science
Video Construction and pictures
Exemplary
The project is well constructed. It also includes pictures and/or diagrams that align properly with the audio recorded over the video.
Proficient
The project is well constructed. It also includes all but 1 pictures and/or diagrams that align properly with the audio recorded over the video.
Acceptable
The project is missing 2 to 9 pictures, and/ or the pictures and audio do not align with their content.
Needs Improvement
The project is missing most pictures and/ or diagrams, or none of the pictures align with the audio recorded over the video.
Project Assembly
Exemplary
Display board is complete, colorful and presentable; All components of the project have been included.
Proficient
All components of the project have been included but some items are messy.
Acceptable
Only some of the required components of the project have been included.
Needs Improvement
Very few required components of the project have been included.
Scientific Theory
Exemplary
Student represented Scientist's theory very well with an experiment, diagram, or model.
Proficient
Student represented Scientist's theory fairly very well with an experiment, diagram, or model.
Acceptable
Student represented Scientist's theory fairly well with an experiment, diagram, or model but lacked in enough detail and explanation, or some parts were confusing or unclear.
Needs Improvement
Student did not represent Scientist's theory accurately
Video Format
Exemplary
N/A
Proficient
The video has a title scene with the student's name, period, and scientist's name included, and a reference page at the conclusion of the video that includes all sources in APA format.
Acceptable
The video either does not have a title scene with the student's name, period, and scientist's name included, or a reference page at the conclusion of the video that includes some sources in APA format.
Needs Improvement
The video does not have a title scene with the student's name, period, and scientist's name included, or a reference page at the conclusion of the video that includes some sources in APA format.
Connection with student
Exemplary
The student thoroughly explains the commonalities that they have with the scientist citing at least one specific example to support the claim, and discuss how he/ or she would have handled the scientist's struggles, or failures.
Proficient
The student did not thoroughly explain the commonalities that they have with the scientist, or did not cite at least one specific example to support the claim, or did not discuss how he/ or she would have handled the scientist's struggles, or failures.
Acceptable
The student did not thoroughly explain the commonalities that they have with the scientist, and/or did not cite at least one specific example to support the claim, and/or did not discuss how he/ or she would have handled the scientist's struggles, or failures.
Needs Improvement
The student did not thoroughly explain the commonalities that they have with the scientist, and did not cite at least one specific example to support the claim, and did not discuss how he/ or she would have handled the scientist's struggles, or failures.
Timing
Exemplary
N/A
Proficient
Video length was within 15 seconds of the 90 second time goal.
Acceptable
Video was 15 to 30 seconds divergent of the 90 second time goal.
Needs Improvement
Video was 30 or more seconds divergent of the 90 second time goal.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.