Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: St. Johns River Pollution rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
St. Johns River Pollution
Students have been asked to create a website about the St. Johns River and the pollution it is facing due to humans. The students then present their website to the class.
Rubric Code:
MX8734C
By
mdickinson2016
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
St. Johns River Pollution
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
SC.5.L.17B
Poor
The students website and presentation does not mention the impact humans have on the St. Johns River at all in their presentation.
Fair
The students show understanding of the impact humans have on the St. Johns River. Students give 1-2 examples of how humans impact the St. Johns on their website and discussed with the class during their presentation.
Good
The students have a clear understanding of why humans have an impact on the St. Johns River. 3+ examples of how humans impact the St. Johns are stated on their website and discussed with the class during their presentation.
SC.5.L.15.In.1
Poor
The students do not identify ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the pollution of the St. Johns River.
Fair
The students give 1-2 ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the
St. Johns River pollution on their website and when presenting to the class.
Good
The students give 3-4 ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the St. Johns River pollution on their website and when presenting to the class.
LAFS.5.RI.3.AP.7a
Poor
Students used 0-1 print or online source to fuel their research throughout the project.
Fair
Students used 2-3 print or online sources to fuel their research throughout the project.
Good
Students used 4+ print or online sources to fuel their research throughout the project.
Knowledge Constructor 3B
Poor
Students did not use reliable resources when searching for information. (Students did not use .org, .edu, .gov resources)
Fair
Students used 2-3 reliable resources.
Good
Students used 4+ reliable resources.
Attractiveness
Poor
The students website is extremely difficult to navigate and use of font, color, graphics, etc. is extremely distracting.
Fair
The students website is hard to navigate at times, with font, color, and graphics that may be distracting.
Good
The students website is well organized and makes excellent use of font. color, graphics, etc. to enhance their website.
Presentation
Poor
The presentation delivery was not smooth and audience attention was often lost.
Fair
The presentation was noticeably rehearsed, fairly smooth, and held audience attention most of the time.
Good
The presentation was well rehearsed, smooth, and kept the attention of the audience the whole time.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.