Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Group Interview Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Group Interview Presentation Rubric
Group Interview Presentation Rubric
This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.
Rubric Code:
MX346WX
By
mperine
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Group Presentation Rubric
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Nees Improvement
(N/A)
Teamwork/Participation
Excellent
The group worked very well with each other and everyone did their part.
Good
The group worked well with each other and talked to each other. Some members did more than others.
Fair
Group was able to work together a little but one person took over.
Nees Improvement
Group did not work well together.
Content
Excellent
Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.
Good
Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.
Fair
Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.
Nees Improvement
Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.
Questions
Excellent
Questions were extremely deep and interesting. They help the viewer to have a deeper understanding of the text and characters.
Good
Questions were somewhat deep and interesting. They somewhat help the viewer to have a better understanding of the text and characters.
Fair
Questions were plot based or basic. Questions don't really help the viewer have a better understanding of the text.
Nees Improvement
Questions were poor and ill formed.
Answers
Excellent
Answers are very well thought out with extreme attention to detail and much of the knowledge based in findings within the book.
Good
Answers are fairly well thought out with some attention given to the knowledge found in the text.
Fair
Answer are haphazard and do not really address the question asked. They fail to show preparation.
Nees Improvement
Answers are unlikely with no base in book content.
Subjects:
English
History
Science
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.