Skip to main content
iRubric: Christopher Greco CORE.450.02 Participation Template rubric

iRubric: Christopher Greco CORE.450.02 Participation Template rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Christopher Greco CORE.450.02 Participation Template 
RWU CORE 450 Participation Rubric
Rubric Code: LX2C795
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Chris Greco CORE.450.02
RWU CORE 450 Participation Rubric
  Poor=D

Cannot be changed

1 pts

Fair=C

Cannot be changed

2 pts

Good=B

Can include Criteria below but must include your added criteria

3 pts

Excellent=A

Must include your added criteria with evidence of Awareness, Integrity, Authenticity, and Commitment.

4 pts

Preparation

Enter description

Poor=D

makes spontaneous but uninformed comments, obvious that required pre-reading not completed.
Fair=C

Comments are informed but lack completeness of comprehensive preparation
Good=B

Read all assigned material, yet doesn't fully prepare for discussions in class
Excellent=A

Have contributed throughout the entirety of the class. Did all assignments on time. Challenges other students logic.
Articulation

Enter description

Poor=D

Mispronunciation, poor use of words, poorly organized ideas
Fair=C

Uses jargon, common expression rather than appropriate technical terms
Good=B

Clear and organized use of language, expresses ideas fluently, visual supplements. Understands material to an extent.
Excellent=A

Effectively voices opinion in a clear and coherent way.
Shows full understanding of material and ideas.
Presentation

Enter description

Poor=D

Speaks too softly for all to hear, addresses only the instructor, monotone, upspeak
Fair=C

Inconsistent in presentation, needs reminding, variable style, mannerisms
Good=B

Eye contact, address all of class, audible volume, interest & inflection in voice
Excellent=A

Add comments and speak full opinion in a clear and coherent fashion. Shows upmost interest in topic and reflects on opinion
Participation Frequency

Poor=D

Does not contribute or alternately dominates discussion
Fair=C

Irregularly participates
Good=B

Initiates questions and comments
Added feedback in a few of the group talks located on Bridges.
Excellent=A

Participated in all group discussions, and gives full feedback. Participates inside and outside of the classroom
Vocabulary

Poor=D

Uses cliché's mundane, vocabulary, uses terms incorrectly
Fair=C

Inconsistent in use of proper terms
Good=B

Demonstrates knowledge somewhat accurate use of terms, doesn't fully understand major topics gone over
Excellent=A

Clear and coherently understands the terms discussed in class, demonstrates full knowledge
Receptive

Poor=D

Defensive, demeans others' comments, talks over them, or disregards feedback
Fair=C

Is respectful and listens, but does not apply feedback
Good=B

accurately listens to and considers feedback from others, doesn't give full input
Excellent=A

Consistently listens to others opinion in mind and respect it. Full understanding of peoples input. Creates discussion.
Originality/creativity

Poor=D

Restatement of readings or comments already offered
Fair=C

Unconventional ideas but may not be well thought out or practical
Good=B

Presents novel view, different perspective, original approaches, gives subpar input, doesn't think outside the box
Excellent=A

Always trying to think of new ideas to better others, Full creativity, full perspective
Inclusion

Poor=D

Does not mention others or further develop ideas previously discussed
Fair=C

Implies contributions of others and bases argument on previous contributions
Good=B

Briefly builds on and relates to others, not to full ability
Excellent=A

Fully and accurately builds on other's concepts to develop an improved concept. Take other's input and use towards themselves
Rhetoric

Poor=D

Argues opinion or emotion without evidence
Fair=C

Provides weak or inconsistent evidence or reasoning
Good=B

Gives some evidence supporting assertions, gives examples, not fully and consistently
Excellent=A

Successfully provides ample information regarding information, takes others into consideration, fully exemplifies their meaning
Relevance & value

Poor=D

tangential or pedantic
Fair=C

Contributes on portions or segments, but misses the big picture
Good=B

Comments are somewhat pertinent to topic and add facts and perspectives,
Excellent=A

Consistently accepted the class relevance & values,would add input on topics whether agreeing or disagreeing, full contribution



Keywords:
  • RWU, SUST 101, SUST.101


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16