Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: PowerPoint Presentations rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
PowerPoint Presentations
This guide provides a method of evaluating the performance, content, and design of presentations given with PowerPoint slideshows.
Rubric Code:
ZXW89B4
By
gregorylewis
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
PowerPoint Presentations
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
0 pts
Substantive Content
Excellent
All information presented is 100% relevant to the main points and conclusions, without unnecessary content. Information also fully supported the analysis. No typos.
Good
Most information directly supported the presentation's conclusions and analysis. One or two typos were apparent.
Fair
Enough information was related to the topic or analysis to reach the conclusion, but many questions remained unaddressed.
Poor
Information included in the presentation was either irrelevant or insufficient to support the topic or analysis. Errors and typos were prevalent on each slide.
Graphic Design
Excellent
Slides were simple, elegant, and used high quality/resolution images. Design followed the grid system. Color was harmonious. Text was very minimal with a maximum of ten words per slide and a minimum of 30pt font. No bullet points, but rather a creative display that related to imagery.
Good
Slides were standard, template style design with no additional creativity involved. Design mostly kept to the grid system with a few incongruous placements. Images were high quality, but perhaps not the best examples. Text was minimal, font size was consistent and presented without bullet points.
Fair
Slides were put together with little conscious decision making. Minimal logical relationship between elements. Inconsistent "look" or theme. Text was heavy with various font sizes. Images were functional but of low quality.
Poor
Slides were disjointed and unorganized, with overlapping images and text violating the grid everywhere. Color was used haphazardly with clashing results. More than 100 words were used per slide in bullet points. Images were blocky at low resolution.
Infographics
Excellent
All data was displayed in simple, creative ways with minimal traditional formats, such as bar charts and graphs. Each graphic was immediately legible as to its message.
Good
Some data was presented in nonstandard, creative ways. Most attempts were well-received and without necessary explanation.
Fair
All data was presented in standard, automatically generated graphs and histograms without any additional creativity.
Poor
No graphics were used to present data, but rather were featured in text.
Verbal Delivery
Excellent
Voice was loud and clear with no unintended pauses, "uhh"s, or "um"s. Information was delivered as an engaging narrative with appropriate amounts of humor, rhetorical questions, and suspense. Never read the text from any slide
Good
Voice was mostly loud and clear with minimal pauses. Information was well presented and mostly engaging. Some information read from text when presenter needed to.
Fair
Voice was average, but disinterested or bored. Information was basically transferred to the audience without much effort toward engagement.
Poor
Voice was soft, unsure, or mumbled. Presenter was completely unprepared and without practice. All delivery was either read directly from the slides or made up on the spot. Pauses were constant.
Body Language
Excellent
Presenter maintained eye contact at all times and only looked at slides when pointing to a feature; seemed excited to present; moved while speaking without being overly animated; effective use of hand gestures.
Good
Presenter usually was looking at an audience member while speaking; seemed happy to deliver the presentation; used hand gestures most of the time and changed position occasionally.
Fair
Presenter seldom gained eye contact and if so, chose the same few audience members; seemed ambivalent about presenting; used minimal effort to move or use hand gestures.
Poor
Presenter never looked at any audience member; seemed to want to be anywhere else but there; stood completely still or committed to nervous twitching.
Slide Effects
Excellent
No slide transitions were used. Animations were not used on text, but only info graphics when necessary. Audio was employed only to enhance a point.
Good
If anything, only quick fades were used for transitions. Some animations may have been used on text. Audio or video may have been used.
Fair
Presenter relied on effects as a means to enhance the otherwise lacking content and delivery. Video was used to get out of presenting that information.
Poor
Ample use of the most canned and cheesy automatic effects for no discernible reason.
Audience Reaction
Excellent
Audience was attentive and engaged; laughed at appropriate times; many more questions were asked than time allowed for answering at the end.
Good
Audience was paying attention; followed the presenter's leads; a respectable amount of questions were asked at the end.
Fair
Audience was mostly paying attention, but out of politeness. Some were checking cell phones or looking elsewhere. Very few questions were asked at the end.
Poor
Audience was incredulous and/or leaving during the presentation. No apparent interest was displayed.
Subjects:
Social Sciences
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Social Sciences rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.