Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Print Portfolio rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Print Portfolio
Reduction Lino Print "Room with a View"
Linoleum Block Print Unit Poetry inspired
Rubric Code:
Z92446
By
Shanslat
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Linoleum Block Printing
100 %
Poor (No)
5 pts
Fair (No,but)
6 pts
Good (Yes, but)
7 pts
Excellent (Yes)
8 pts
Following Directions
10 %
Poor (No)
•Missing required prints •Not labeled correctly
•Out of order.
•No additional prints
Fair (No,but)
•Completed most of the required prints
•Compiled in orde
•Inconsistencies in labeling (Signed, Titled and Numbered
•No additional prints
Good (Yes, but)
•Completed all of the required prints
•Compiled in order Signed, •Titled and Numbered inFolder.<BR>
•May have an additional print included
Excellent (Yes)
•Completed all of the required prints
•Compiled in order, Signed, •Titled and Numbered in Folder.<BR>
•Includes multiple extra prints with wide variety
Mastering The Material
20 %
Concept Design
Poor (No)
•Block design is overly simplified.
•Poetry inspirations is unclear and unrelated.
•no variety of visual elements includes,image is flat.
Fair (No,but)
•Poetry inspirations concept is limited.
•Limited range of visual elements used
Good (Yes, but)
•Poetry inspirations is clearly and conveyed through image choice and well executed.
•Range of visual elements used
Excellent (Yes)
•Poetry inspirations is compellingly conveyed through image, meaning is layered and complex and very clearly executed.
•Wide range of visual elements used
Creativity
20 %
Carving the block
Poor (No)
•Image is not original and is copied, overly cliche, not complex, lacking composition balance<BR>
<BR>
•Llimed variety of color choices of ink and paper, <BR>
•Unclear and sloppy carving
Fair (No,but)
•Image is not well defined with only a few elements<BR>
•Composition limited personal expression
•Block design is simple and has limited use of visual textures
<BR>
•Limited variety of color choices of ink and paper•Block has rough edges and unfinished areas
Good (Yes, but)
•Image is original, and complex, show the artists hand in choice of line, texture and composition
•Block Design has a variety of visual Texture
•Thoughtful interpretation of how the image relates to the concept<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
•Block has complex details clearly caved out
Excellent (Yes)
•Image is original, and complex, shows the artists hand in choice of line, texture and composition
•Block Design has a wide variety of visual texture
•Insightful interpretation of how the image relates to the concept<BR>
<BR>
•Block has intricate and complex details clearly caved out with care
...
Craftsmanship
20 %
Printing
Poor (No)
•No effort made to establish the correct amount of ink.
•No variety of color choice from print to print
•Incorrectly or not labeled at all prints are missing in the portfolio
•Paper is messy around the edges
Fair (No,but)
•Areas of Ink are either too thick or too thin
•A variety of color choices of both ink and papers,
•Ink and paper choices are compatible with the images in the print.
•Paper has some ink in the edges
•Labeling is not clear or correct on all prints,
Good (Yes, but)
•Ink is a relatively even consistency, not too thick or too thin on most prints.
•A variety of color choices of both ink and papers
•Ink and paper choices are compatible with the images in the print
•Paper is clean around the edges of the print<BR>
•Labeling done neatly in pencil
Excellent (Yes)
•Ink is a clear sharp even consistency, not too thick or too thin on all prints.
•Variety of Careful color choices of both ink and papers
•Ink and paper choices enhance the image/concept in the print
•Paper is clean around the edges of the print<BR>
•Labeling done neatly in pencil
Effort
20 %
Poor (No)
•Frequently tardy or absent<BR>
•Leaves class un excused<BR>
•Does not clean up after<BR>
•Spends excessive socializing/texting or otherwise not focusing on work<BR>
•Inconsiderate of others
Fair (No,but)
•Is sometime tardy •Socializing/talking too much to class mates<BR>
•Inconsistent clean up.<BR>
•Can be wasteful of supplies
Good (Yes, but)
•Arrives on time<BR>
•Works in a focused manner<BR>
•Cleans up after<BR>
respectful of room and supplies
Excellent (Yes)
•Arrives on time<BR>
•works in a focused and consistent manner<BR>
•asks for help if unclear on assignment<BR>
•Is helpful to others <BR>
•Cleans up thoroughly<BR>
•Treats equipment and supplies with respect and care after working •comes in outside of class if needed to complete work.
Effort
10 %
Poor (No)
•Completes the project with no re-evaluated
•Does not make corrections even when
identified
Fair (No,but)
•Completes the project with limited self evalualtion and limited corrections
Good (Yes, but)
•Willing to make changes during the process and corrects errors
•Takes direction
Excellent (Yes)
•Continually examines and self edits artwork, makes changes as needed,
accepts criticism and makes adjustments
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.