Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Understanding of value and processes in teamwork rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Understanding of value and processes in teamwork
Understanding of value and processes in teamwork
Students are assessed on their understanding of the rationale for, method to attain successful, and parameters for teamwork on projects in science. STEM cooperative groups are essential to NGSS PBL. http://www.middleweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Student-Teaming-Tips-AJolly.pdf
Rubric Code:
YX7BB9C
By
SmithChristiD
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Teamwork rationale and parameters.
Excellent
5 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
0 pts
Q1: Size of team
Excellent
*2-6 members,
*dependent on the nature of the activity,
*number of tasks, and
*the amount of time allotted.
Good
Answer has 2 - 3 of items in excellent category.
Fair
Answer has 1 of items in excellent category.
Poor
Answer has none of items in excellent category.
Q2: Importance of asking questions
Excellent
*The teacher needs to help but will only be able to if students ask questions,
*the purpose is to help students discover content deficiencies,
*to uncover the importance of knowledge in areas other than science.
Good
Answer has 2 of 3 items in excellent category.
Fair
Answer has one of the items in excellent category.
Poor
Answer has none of items in excellent category.
Q3: Team work in real life -example
Excellent
*Example is given,
*explanation of failure of team members in example to do their job is clearly delineated.
Good
*Example is given,
*explanation of failure of team members in example to do their job is not clearly delineated.
Fair
*No example is given, *some rationale is given for failure of team members to do their jobs.
Poor
*No example is given, *some rationale is given for failure of team members to do their jobs, ideas are not expressed clearly.
Q4: Roles on team
Excellent
*Example is given,
*Varying skills of each team member,
*Different backgrounds and expertise by each group member,
*expert areas enable members to focus on one topic
Good
Contains example and 3 of 4 items in excellent category.
Fair
Contains no example; has 2 of 4 answers in excellent category
Poor
Contains no example, but has 1 answer found in excellent category
Q5:Team member must know these
Excellent
*Responsibilities of the team,
*individual responsibilities, time limit,
*special procedures, *consequences for failure to follow guidelines,
*what to do in case of student absence
Good
4 - 5 of 6 in excellent category
Fair
3 or 4 of 6 in excellent category
Poor
1 or 2 in excellent category
Q6: Interaction of team members
Excellent
*Interaction skills need to be learned and practiced,
*Team members need to ask teacher for guidance, *members need to listen to each other and reflect back what others are saying,
*members must compromise,
*students must share opinions, and
*self assess
Good
5 of 6 in excellent category
Fair
3 or 4 in excellent category
Poor
1 or 2 of 6 in excellent category
Q7: Monitoring group communications
Excellent
*Regular assessment is needed,
*tell what worked well,
*tell what skills have been mastered,
*need to ask for help when needed,
*tell how engaged group members are
Good
4 of 5 in excellent category
Fair
2 - 3 of 5 in excellent category
Poor
1 of 5 in excellent category
Q8: Group debriefing
Excellent
*Team needs time to do this,
*the members must assess the quality of contributions,
*and the strengths of groups members,
*finally, they must assess opportunities for improvement
Good
3 of 4 in excellent category
Fair
2 of 4 in excellent category
Poor
1 of 4 in excellent category
Keywords:
STEM, NGSS, teamwork, cooperative group, jigsaw approach
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.