0 pts
1 pts
2 pts
3 pts
4 pts
• Who is saying this? • Who is the person who produced this piece? • What is his or her background? • Generally trying to find what makes that person the most different from you is a useful approach, unless there is something about them that is familiar to you and then you can use that.
• What is the occasion? When was this said -under what circumstances? • What is the time & place of the piece? • What else (some event/period) was going on at that time that might have had an influence on the author? • What is the context that might have encouraged the writing to happen? • Is there another document that was produced before this that the author might be thinking of when writing this? • Why was it written (or drawn or photographed)?
• To whom is this piece directed? 1 or many ppl; a certain person or certain people? • How does this affect how it is written? • Was it written as a private record? to be read/heard by others? official document for a ruler? commissioned painting/photograph? • Does it respond to unstated arguments/concerns? • what presumptions & preconceptions do we bring to this text? difference in values/ideas of those writing it v. those reading it? Does this affect our und
• Why did they say this? • For what purpose was the document produced? What were their reasons, motives or goals? • What is at stake for the author in this text? What in the document tells you this? What does this tell you about the author? • You need to connect some motivation on the part of the person creating the text with the document itself. This is one of the harder ones to do correctly and the one most often mistakenly cited.
• What is being said? general topics, content, and ideas contained in the text (summarized)? • What do you learn that helps you answer the question? • What is missing or unexplained & why would that be the case? • Compared to other texts of similar topics/backgrounds, what makes this text different/similar? • Does other evidence support or contest the source? • What does the document tell us without actually telling us? interpretation v. fact.
• How is this being said? • What vocabulary (especially but not only adjectives) does it use? How does this convey the intent, the point of view of the author (anger, disdain, admiration, etc.)? • What is the reason for them to adopt this tone? Are they trying to make a case and if so how does it affect their presentation? Are they successful with their strategy?
Does this document have a historical significance? Why/why not?
Can you think of other documents that might offer similar or opposing points of view? What are those opposing points of view?