Skip to main content
iRubric: 2-D Design Portfolio Breadth rubric

iRubric: 2-D Design Portfolio Breadth rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
2-D Design Portfolio Breadth 
2-D Design Portfolio Breadth
2-d AP portfolio breadth
Rubric Code: XXC977W
By jeffreybell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Scoring Descriptors
  excellent

6 pts

Strong

5 pts

Good

4 pts

moderate

3 pts

weak

2 pts

poor

1 pts

a

Broad Investigation of 2-D Design Principles
excellent

The work shows an informed investigation of a broad range of 2-D design principles.
Strong

The work shows a thoughtful investigation of a range of 2-D design principles
Good

The work shows a good investigation of a variety of 2-D design principles
moderate

The work shows superficial decision making or discovery, with little sense of an extended
investigation into 2-D design principles.
weak

The work shows very little evidence of investigation of a range of 2-D design principles.
poor

The work shows negligible investigation of a range of 2-D design principles
b

Originality and Innovative Thinking
excellent

The work clearly demonstrates original vision, a variety of innovative ideas and/or risk
taking, and inventive articulation of a broad range of the elements and principles of 2-D
design
Strong

The work demonstrates a range of original, innovative ideas and effective manipulation of
the elements and principles of 2-D design
Good

The work demonstrates some originality, some innovative thinking, and purposeful
manipulation of the elements and principles of 2-D design.
moderate

Some original ideas seem to be emerging, or some attempt at innovation with the elements
and principles of 2-D design is evident
weak

The ideas in the work are unoriginal or rely mostly on appropriation; the work does not
show inventive use of the elements and principles of 2-D design.
poor

There is no original or imaginative ideation in the work in regard to the elements and
principles of 2-D design; the work comprises trite, simplistic, or appropriated solutions.
c

Application of 2-D-Design Principles to Broad Range of Design Problems
excellent

The work shows an excellent application of 2-D design principles to a broad range of design
problems
Strong

The work shows strong application of 2-D design principles to a range of design problems
Good

The work shows good application of 2-D design principles to an acceptable range of design
problems.
moderate

The work shows superficial application of 2-D principles to a limited range of design
problems.
weak

The work shows a weak application of 2-D design principles to a very limited range of
design problems.
poor

The work shows little or no useful application of 2-D design principles, regardless of the
number of problem-solving attempts
d

Purpose and Intention in the Compositional Use of the Elements and Principles of Design
excellent

The work clearly demonstrates a broad range of intentions or purposes; it articulates
multiple insights.
Strong

The work demonstrates a variety of intentions or purposes; a range of insights is apparent.
Good

The work shows a variety of intentions and purposes, although they may not be clearly
articulated.
moderate

The work shows a limited range of intention and purpose
weak

The work does not clearly articulate a range of intentions or purposes.
poor

The work is repetitive in regard to intentions or purposes.
e

Confident, Evocative Work That Engages the Viewer
excellent

The work as a whole is confident and evocative; it engages the viewer with visual qualities
(for example, verve or nuanced subtlety
Strong

Most of the work engages the viewer with expressive and evocative qualities; the work
suggests confidence.
Good

Some of the work has discernible evocative or engaging qualities, though confidence is not
strongly apparent; conversely the work may display confidence but not be engaging.
moderate

The work is emerging in terms of potentially engaging qualities; confidence is
questionable.
weak

There is little about the work that engages the viewer; the work lacks confidence
poor

The work does not engage the viewer; there is no confidence evident in the work
f

Technical Competence and Skill with Materials and Media
excellent

The work is technically excellent; materials and media are used effectively to express ideas.
Strong

The work is technically strong; materials and media are used well to express ideas
Good

The work demonstrates good technical competence and use of materials and media;
technical aspects and articulation of ideas do not always work together
moderate

The work demonstrates moderate technical competence and some knowledgeable use of
materials and media.
weak

The work is generally awkward; it demonstrates marginal technical competence and
awkward use of materials and media.
poor

The work is generally inept; use of materials and media is naïve and lacks skill or technical
competence.
g

Appropriation and the Student “Voice
excellent

Any apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other
artists clearly provides a visual reference that is transformed in the service of a larger,
personal vision in which the student’s “voice” is prominent
Strong

Any apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of other
artists shows a strong sense of the student’s “voice” and individual transformation of the
images.
Good

Within the apparent appropriation of published or photographic sources or the work of
other artists, the student’s “voice” is discernible; the images have been manipulated to
express the student’s individual ideas
moderate

If published or photographic sources or the work of other artists are appropriated, the work
appears to be nearly direct reproductions; even if skillfully rendered, the student’s “voice”
and the individual transformation of the images are minimal
weak

The works appear to be direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of
other artists; there is little discernible student “voice” or individual transformation.
poor

The works appear as direct copies of published or photographic sources or the work of
other artists; there is no discernible student “voice” or individual transformation.
h

Image Quality (for Weak and Poor Breadth Sections Only)
excellent
Strong
Good
moderate
weak

The images are difficult to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly
lighted.
poor

The images are impossible to see properly because they are too small, unfocused, or poorly
lighted; there may too few images to constitute investigation of breadth.
I

Overall Accomplishment and Quality)
excellent

There may be a varying range of accomplishment among the works, but overall the work
reaches a level of excellent breadth and quality.
Strong

There may be varying levels of accomplishment among the works, but overall the work is of
strong breadth and quality.
Good

There may be uneven levels of accomplishment among the works, but overall the work is of
good breadth and quality.
moderate

There may be an emerging level of accomplishment among the works, and overall the work
is of moderate breadth and quality.
weak

There is little evidence of accomplishment demonstrated in the works; overall the work is of
weak breadth and quality.
poor

Overall the work lacks accomplishment and is of poor breadth and quality.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16