Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Science Fair Teacher Grade Sheet Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Science Fair Teacher Grade Sheet Rubric
Science Fair Research Lab Report Paper 2011
Holy Rosary Academy and Preschool Science Fair
Rubric Code:
X98645
By
doberwoman014
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project Points
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Poor
3 pts
Incomplete
2 pts
Failed to meet standards
1 pts
Title & overall appearance
20 pts
Excellent
Title page includes student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date right justified. Title is bold-faced, centered mid-page and concisely addresses project topic.
Good
Title page is missing one of the following: student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date right justified. Title addresses project topic.
Poor
Title page is missing two of the following: student's name, subject, teacher and science fair date right justified. Title somewhat addresses project topic.
Incomplete
Title page is missing several components and is difficult to understand.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Background Information/intervie
30 pts
Excellent
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, provides background information on science concepts related to the question, and explains why student is interested in the topic and fully understood how it worked.
Good
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, provides background information on some science concepts, explains why student is interested in the topic and understands how it worked.
Poor
Student introduces specific, testable topic question, but provides little background information on science concepts related to the question. Does not explain why student is interested in the topic and is unsure of how it worked.
Incomplete
Student is missing two or more of the following: topic question, background information, why student is interested in the topic. Does not understand how it worked.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Hypothesis
15 pts
Excellent
Hypothesis is testable and directly relates to the question. At least two reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Good
Hypothesis is testable, directly relates to the question. One reason is given for making this hypothesis.
Poor
Hypothesis correlates to the purpose, but is difficult to test. No reasons are given for making the hypothesis.
Incomplete
Hypothesis does not answer the research question and is not testable.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Materials and Procedure
15 pts
Excellent
MATERIALS:<BR>
ALL required materials are listed. <BR>
PROCEDURE:<BR>
Steps are numbered, logical and thorough enough to be repeated without question or confusion.
Good
MATERIALS:<BR>
Student included all items required. <BR>
PROCEDURE:<BR>
Steps are numbered, logical and thorough, but one or more steps are missing or confusing.
Poor
MATERIALS:<BR>
Student included most items required. <BR>
PROCEDURE:<BR>
Steps are logical, but somewhat confusing.
Incomplete
Student did not list all necessary items, or use appropriate materials. Steps are not detailed or logical, and/or missing. It would be extremely difficult to follow or duplicate this experiment.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Data and Results
20 pts
Excellent
DATA:<BR>
Data is properly labeled and presented in all of the following ways:<BR>
___Data Table<BR>
___Graph<BR>
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations<BR>
RESULTS:<BR>
Student clearly explains any trends in data, making reference to key data points.
Good
DATA:<BR>
Data is properly labeled and presented in 2 of the following ways:<BR>
___Data Table<BR>
___Graph<BR>
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations<BR>
RESULTS:<BR>
Student somewhat explains trends in data, making reference to key data points.
Poor
DATA:<BR>
Data is not properly labeled and presented in only 1 of the following ways:<BR>
___Data Table<BR>
___Graph<BR>
___Photos/Videos OR Illustrations<BR>
RESULTS:<BR>
Student does not explain trends in data.
Incomplete
Data is not clearly represented or explained.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Conclusion
15 pts
Excellent
Conclusion answers the question based on data alone. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect and discusses possible explanations for results.
Good
Conclusion answers the question based on redata alone. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, showing an understanding of the scientific process.
Poor
Conclusion answers the question based on data, but leaves some confusion.
Incomplete
Conclusion is confusing and/or does not answer the research question. Student does not attempt to explain if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Journal
25 pts
Excellent
All information is documented using and organized in a clear and precise manner.
Good
All information is documented and is organized.
Poor
Most information is documented.
Incomplete
Information is not documented correctly showing little to no effort.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Overall Content
20 pts
Excellent
Student uses correct grammar, puntuation, and spelling throughout the report. Report flows from one idea to the next. Content is correct and complete.
Good
Student has fewer than five mistakes in the report. Report jumps from one idea to the next, but does display clear understanding of the project
Poor
Student have several misspelled words, poor grammar and poor punctuation. Report does not flow and is difficult to understand.
Incomplete
Report shows lack of effort and is unclear thoughout.
Failed to meet standards
Displays little to no effort or understanding.
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.