Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: S221 Research Paper Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
S221 Research Paper Rubric
S221 Research Paper Rubric
Human Growth and Development in Social Environment
Rubric Code:
WX64455
By
suji2128
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Interview Assignment Rubric
Inadequate
1 pts
Below Average
2 pts
Average
3 pts
Above Average
4 pts
Exceptional
5 pts
Description of Interview
Inadequate
Fails to describe, omits or lacks all area
Below Average
Briefly describes some areas but does not provide specifics
Average
Describes all areas but lacks details, richness and keen observation
Above Average
Describes and identifies all areas adequately with specifics and details
Exceptional
ID and Provides all areas with specific robust details; Thinks critically to provide clear, coherent and logically organized description
Significant Events/Diversity
Inadequate
Fails to cite significant events and issues related to diversity
Below Average
Provides little information regarding significant events and diversity
Average
Describes significant events and cites issues related to diversity
Above Average
Describes significant event in detail and thinks critically regarding diversity issues
Exceptional
ID all significant events discussed and provides comprehensive reflection of all areas of diversity (race, ethnicity, rurality, gender/sexual orientation, disability, social class)
ID Risks/ID Protection Factors
Inadequate
Fails to cite any risks or protective factors
Below Average
Cites either Risks or Protective factors but not both
Average
Cites Risks and Protective Factors with adequate details but not how it interrelates to whole person
Above Average
Cite all Risks and Protective Factors with specific detail with critical and creative link to whole person
Exceptional
In depth ID and analysis of all risks and protective factors applied to whole person
ID Bio-Psycho-Socilal-Spiritual
Inadequate
Fails to assess and cite Bio-Psycho-Social-Spiritual framework
Below Average
Discusses some but not all four area of framework
Average
Discusses all four areas but lacks details cited from text or class power points where applicable
Above Average
Discusses all areas, cites details and provides adequate specifics, including intercultural, civic knowledge
Exceptional
In depth exploration and citing of each category applicable, rich discussion of intellectual and civic knowledge, narratives include critical thinking
ID/Apply/Link Course Theories
Inadequate
Fails to ID theory from course or mentions theory from course or mentions theory in name but does not fully ID/apply analysis
Below Average
ID/Discusses theory but provides little connection to person
Average
Provides adequate ID of theory, with examples that apply to person
Above Average
Provides ID of more than one theory, and cites specific application to person
Exceptional
Critical analysis of more than one theory, in-depth analysis that evidences expertise of theory and ability to apply to person and experience
ID/Apply/Link Course Theories
Inadequate
Fails to ID theory from course or mentions theory in name but does not fully ID/apply analysis
Below Average
ID/Discusses theory but provides little connection to person
Average
Provides adequate ID of theory, with examples that apply to person
Above Average
Provides ID of more than one theory, and cites specific application to person
Exceptional
Critical analysis of more than one theory, in-depth analysis that evidences expertise of theory and ability to apply to person and personal experience
ID/Apply Address macro, mezzo,---
Inadequate
Fails to address family, community, culture, and individual strengths or cites only some or Systems Theory incorrectly
Below Average
ID/Discusses all but with little detail, specifics, or critical thinking provided
Average
Adequately ID/Apply all three areas as well as individual strengths but lacks analysis or extensive literacy
Above Average
ID/Apply fully with specific examples to person, integrates the analysis of Systems Theory
Exceptional
Comprehensive application of all areas and strengths; applies Strengths Perspective and Systems Theory accurately, provides rich discussion and in depth analysis that evidences expertise of these concepts and frameworks
SQ Assessment
Inadequate
Unable to assess or lacks assessment inquiry and analysis regarding individual process and functioning
Below Average
Provides a thin discussion with no detail regarding individual developmental process and current functioning
Average
Sufficiently assesses and applying gerontology theory to their analysis of process and functioning
Above Average
Thinks critically and applies robust assessment of person’s process and functioning as well as applies Gerontology theory
Exceptional
Critical, creative and in depth assessment analysis of process and functioning, accurate application of Strengths Perspective and Gerontology Theories, Intercultural and/or civic knowledge applied
Share what you learned
Inadequate
Does not share anything learned or forgets to complete both parts of this reflection
Below Average
Lists answers briefly but doesn’t provide details, critical thinking or personal experience
Average
Adequately explains both parts and cites NASW but lacks in depth analysis, rich description
Above Average
Provides in depth reasoning to all areas, applies particular NASW values/ethics with examples
Exceptional
All areas involve in depth personal inquiry, intercultural knowledge is applied in a logically and organized narrative
Scholarly References
Inadequate
Omits 5 references or cites less than 5
Below Average
Provides 5 references but some are not scholarly or gov't, or they are old
Average
Provides 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref., adequately cites and applies showing literacy, inquiry and analysis
Above Average
Provides 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref., in depth literate analysis, and narrative demonstrates succinct organization
Exceptional
Clearly Identifies and cites all 5 current scholarly/gov’t ref. into paper showing understanding of in depth analysis, evidences critical thinking and creative application to person
APA
Inadequate
Omits APA or incorrectly applies APA format; or attempts citations and application, but does not follow APA
Below Average
Many APA, spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors resulting in difficult reading. Errors are frequent
Average
Most APA citations, grammar correct allowing effective reading of work but some errors
Above Average
Few APA, punctuation, spelling, grammatical errors
Exceptional
APA style correctly applied; work is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors
Subjects:
Psychology
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Psychology rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.