Skip to main content
iRubric: Argumentative Research Paper rubric

iRubric: Argumentative Research Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Argumentative Research Paper 
Argumentative Research Paper
Culminating Assignment and Final Exam for Grade 12 Students. Students selected a topic they were passionate about. They wrote an Argumentative Paper, defending a thesis with an opinion supported by research from peer-reviewed journals found using the JSTOR database. Citations in APA format required.
Rubric Code: WX232A7
By cpapouchis
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Culminating
66 % Preparation
  0

0 pts

1

1 pts

2

2 pts

3

3 pts

4

4 pts

Research Paper Proposal
20 %

0

Not submitted.
1

A topic was submitted in writing within 24 hours of the exam.

No additional requirement, such as an Essential Question, was submitted.
2

Topic approved less than one week but more than 24 hours prior to exam.

Submitted at least one additional requirement such as an Essential Question.
3

Submitted at least 2 out of 4 requirements.

Topic approved and Essential Question determined at least one week prior to exam.
4

Submitted proposal using the template provided OR at least 3 out of 4 requirements of the template including:
- Topic/Why Chosen
- Working Thesis
- Approach to Subject
- Tentative List of References
Pre-Exam Outline
60 %

Notes and Quotations
0

Not submitted.
1

Minimal notes and/or quotations were emailed at the last minute (within 24 hours of the exam).
No in-text citations.
Less than 2 sources.
Almost no evidence of preparation.
2

Minimal notes and quotations were emailed at least 24 hours prior to the exam.
In-text citations were not in APA format.
Between 2 and 4 sources from academic journals found using JSTOR or other approved database.
Little evidence of thorough preparation required to write research paper.
3

Two pages total as a detailed outline in logical sequence OR
one page point form notes and one page quotations.
Quotations must have in-text citations in APA format.
Minimum 5 sources from academic journals found using JSTOR or other approved database.
Emailed in correct format at least 24 hours prior to final exam.
4

Two pages total as a detailed outline in logical sequence OR
one page point form notes and one page quotations.
Quotations must have in-text citations in APA format.
Minimum 5 sources from academic journals found using JSTOR or other approved database.
Emailed in correct format by Tuesday prior to final exam.
References Page
20 %

0

Not submitted.
1

More than four errors or not APA format.
2

Three or four errors.
3

One or two errors.
4

Follows all rules for References page in APA format.
Two minor errors allowed (ie. forgot space after period).
Bonus for no errors!
Final Exam
34 %
  0

0 pts

1

1 pts

2

2 pts

3

3 pts

4

4 pts

Introduction/Thesis
10 %

0

No introduction.
1

Introduction is not interesting AND is not relevant to the topic.
Thesis is missing or is unclear.
2

Introduction is interesting, but the connection to the topic is not always clear.
Thesis may be unclear or the main issues are vague.
3

Hook or attention grabber is weak or rambling.
Thesis provides a clear, strong statement of the main issues and the author's position on the topic.
4

Strong hook or attention grabber.
Thesis provides a clear, strong statement of the main issues and the author's position on the topic.
Support for Position
50 %

0

No support for position.
1

Body paragraphs include 1 or fewer pieces of evidence that are NOT relevant AND/OR not explained.
2

Evidence to support the thesis lacks detail, is not backed up with research, and/or does not include quotations.
3

Each sub-topic that supports the overall thesis contains pieces of evidence that are mostly:
- Specific and relevant
- Interpreted and explained
- Backed up with research including quotations woven into the paragraphs.
4

Each sub-topic that supports the overall thesis contains pieces of evidence that are:
- Specific and relevant
- Interpreted and explained
- Backed up with research including quotations woven into the paragraphs.
Opposing Views and Rebuttal
10 %

0

Not included in essay.
1

Opposing view OR rebuttal not presented.
2

Opposing view is identified but unclear.
Rebuttal is weak and vague in refuting opponent's point of view.
3

Opposing view is presented using research to support the argument.
Rebuttal is moderately clear and concise in refuting opponent's point of view.
4

Opposing view is presented in a compelling way using research to support the argument.
Rebuttal is clear and concise in refuting opponent's point of view.
Conclusion
10 %

0

No conclusion.
1

The conclusion:
- Is unclear about the writer's position.
- Fails to share significance of issue.
- Lacks a connection to the reader's world.
2

The conclusion:
- Leaves the reader somewhat understanding the writer's position.
- Shares significance of issue.
- May lack a connection to the reader's world.
3

The conclusion:
- Leaves the reader solidly understanding the writer's position.
- Shares significance of issue and unanswered questions.
- Attempts to make a connection to the reader's world by leaving reader with something to think about.
4

The conclusion:
- Leaves the reader solidly understanding the writer's position.
- Shares significance of issue and unanswered questions.
- Makes a clear connection to the reader's world by leaving reader with something to think about.
Sequencing/Organization
10 %

0

Not written.
1

Many of the support details or arguments are not in an expected or logical order, distracting the reader and making the essay seem very confusing.
2

A few of the support details or arguments are not in an expected or logical order, distracting the reader and making the essay seem a little confusing.

Transitions are weak.
3

Arguments and support are provided in a fairly logical order that makes it reasonably easy to follow the author's train of thought.

Good
transitions throughout.
4

Arguments and support are provided in a logical order that makes it easy and interesting to follow the author's train of thought.


Evident, and smooth
transitions throughout.
Mechanics
10 %

0

Not written.
1

Little mastery of
mechanics. More than 10 errors in
capitalization,
punctuation, spelling,
and grammar greatly
interfere with
meaning.

Many pronoun/antecedent agreement problems.

Personal pronouns are frequently used.

Mostly informal, non-academic style (colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
2

Student shows
average mastery of
mechanics. Although
errors in spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammar are evident,
the meaning mostly remains
clear; 6-10 errors in total including:

- Pronoun/antecedent agreement problems.

- Personal
pronouns (I, me, my,
mine, you, we) are not used..

Written mostly in appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
3

Above average
mastery of mechanics. Spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammatical errors
are minor and do not interfere with meaning; 3-6 errors in total including:

- Pronoun/antecedent agreement problems.

- Personal
pronouns (I, me, my,
mine, you, we) are not used.

Written mostly in appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).
4

Excellent mastery of
mechanics. Spelling,
capitalization,
punctuation, and
grammar are almost all correct; 2-3 errors in total including:

- Pronoun/antecedent agreement problems.

- Personal
pronouns (I, me, my,
mine, you, we) are not used.

Written in appropriately formal academic style (not colloquial, cliche or “slangy”).



Keywords:
  • Argumentative Essay, University Preparation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16