Skip to main content

iRubric: Digital Storytelling Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Digital Storytelling Project

Rubric Code: W55XW2

By jhall35

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Digital Storytelling Project Enter rubric description
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 2 pts	Excellent 3 pts
SS and Technology Standards 20 % Includes clear examples of how geography played a role in the disaster.	Poor No examples were provided.	Fair At least one example was provided, but it was not clear.	Good At least one clear example was provided.	Excellent More than one clear example was provided.
___ 20 % A map of Japan is included with capital city and latitude and longitude of capital	Poor No map is provided	Fair A map is provided, but it is missing both capital city and latitude and longitude.	Good A map is provided, but it is missing either capital city or latitude and longitude.	Excellent Map of Japan is included with both capital city and the latitude and longitude of that city.
___ 10 % All group members equally contributed via class Wiki, project creation, and presentation.	Poor Group members did not use class Wki,	Fair One or two group members used class Wiki, helped with project creation, and participated in presenting project materials.	Good Most group members used class Wiki, helped with project creation, and participated in presenting project materials.	Excellent All group members used class Wiki, helped with project creation, and participated in presenting project materials.
___ 10 % Multiple types of media were used to enrich the final product. (Text, audio, video, graphics, animation)	Poor Any media used was irrelevant and did not enrich the product.	Fair One type of media was used that enriched the product.	Good More than one type of media was used that enriched the final product.	Excellent Three or more types of media were used that enriched the final product.
___ 10 % Recovery/relief effort is described in detail with media representation/example	Poor No recovery/relief idea is mentioned nor example created.	Fair A recovery/relief effort is mentioned briefly, but no details/media examples are given.	Good A recovery/relief effort is described in detail, but no media representation/example is created.	Excellent A recovery/relief effort is described in detail, and a media representation/example is provided.
Content 20 % All content is accurate and relevant.	Poor The content is not accurate nor relevant.	Fair The content is somewhat relevant, but some of the information represented is inaccurate.	Good All content presented is accurate, but somewhat irrelevant.	Excellent All content presented is accurate and highly relevant.
___ 5 % Multiple sources were used and credited in creating the final product.	Poor No credible sources were used. Information is uncredited or made up.	Fair At least one source was used but not properly credited in the creation of the final product.	Good More than one source was used, but one or more sources was not properly credited in the creation of the final product.	Excellent At least two sources were used and all properly credited in the creation of the final product.
Design and Presentation 2 % All media components work in the final product.	Poor None of the media components work. The product does not play.	Fair Some of the media components work, but are not clear or of good quality. (i.e. Audio cannot be understood)	Good Some or most of the media components work and are clear.	Excellent All media components are functioning properly, and the final product plays during presentation.
___ 1.5 % Text is free of spelling erros	Poor The majority of text has spelling erros. No effort was made to spellcheck final product.	Fair Several spelling errors throughout the final product.	Good One or two spelling erros present in the final product.	Excellent No spelling erros of any kind in the final product.
___ 1.5 % Presenters speak clearly and make eye contact.	Poor None of the presenters speak clearly nor make eye contact.	Fair One presenter either speaks clearly or uses eye contact, but does not do both.	Good At least one presenter speaks clearly and attempts eye contact.	Excellent All presenters speak clearly and make eye contact throughout presentation.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Social Sciences rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n236