- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Mission, Vision, Goals, and Objectives (30 points) rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Mission, Vision, Goals, and Objectives (30 points) Mission, Vision, Strategic Thinking Rubric for assignment 4: Due October 20th Rubric Code: VXX5X33 By muechi Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Mission, Vision, Strategic Thinking
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 1.5 pts	Good 2 pts
Mission Statement
Who are we?	Poor Defines what the organization does, assumes that the organization is only what it appears to do.	Fair Definition explains what the organization does, but does not define the inner core. Definition is not distinct, but general.	Good The definition is distinct, central, and enduring. It draws a distinction between what the organization is and what it does. Defines the inner core of the organization (the guiding purpose and fundamental values combined).
Why do we exist?	Poor Does not include reasoning about why the organization exists.	Fair States why the organization exists, but does not address the needs or problems met or addressed.	Good Describes the social justification for the organization's existence. Addresses the needs or problems that the organization exists to meet or address.
How do we respond to needs?	Poor Does not address how the organization stays actively in touch with the needs and problems.	Fair Mentions informal and formal research, but does not embody continuous and active participation in the field	Good Defines how the organization stays actively in touch with the needs or problems through continuous informal and formal research.
How do we respond to stakeholders?	Poor Does not include information on stakeholders.	Fair Defines stakeholders, but does not mention what those stakeholders value.	Good Defines the relationship the organization has with its key stakeholders. Addresses what the key stakeholders value and how the organization provides that value. Explains how the organization brings public value.
Our philosophy, values, and culture	Poor Organizational philosophy, values, and culture are not defined.	Fair Organizational philosophy, values, and culture are clarified – but not defined to the extent where they can guide decision making on acceptance of proposals or actions.	Good Organizational philosophy, values, and culture are clarified.
What makes us unique?	Poor Does not clarify how the organization is different or distinct and unique.	Fair Defines why the organization is different, but not how they are distinct and unique.	Good Clarity on what makes the organization distinctive or unique, defines distinct contributions.
Vision Statement
What do we want to achieve?	Poor Vision statement does not exist, or it exists but without an overarching goal for the organization	Fair Vision statement exists, but is a vision within reach or something that the organization can easily accomplish. Definition of vision can change depending on different projects or actions.	Good Embodies what the organization wants to achieve. Vision is bold and resonant – may be just out of arms reach, or even impossible to achieve. Vision is not up for debate and provides a clear focus. Makes stakeholders excited about being involved with the organization every day.
Goals and Objectives
Long Term/Outcome Goals	Poor Goals are not stated as an end result, not positive, doesn't meet most SMART criteria. Goals are inappropriately placed.	Fair Goals are stated appropriately, there are 1 out of 2 goals for one of the following: QOL and Health goals, meets most of the SMART criteria. Goals are somewhat placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.	Good Goals are stated well, there is 1 QOL and 1 Health goal stated, meets all SMART criteria. Goals are placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.
Mid-Term/Impact Goals	Poor Goals are not stated as an end result, not positive, doesn't meet most SMART criteria. Goals are inappropriately placed.	Fair Goals are stated appropriately, there are 1 out of 2 goals for one of the following: Behavioral and Environmental goals, meets most of the SMART criteria. Goals are somewhat placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.	Good Goals are stated well, there is 1 behavioral and 1 Environmental goal stated, meets all SMART criteria. Goals are placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.
Short-Term/Impact Goals	Poor Goals are not stated as an end result, not positive, doesn't meet most SMART criteria. Goals are inappropriately placed.	Fair Goals are stated appropriately, there are 2 out of 3 goals for one of the following: Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling goals, meets most of the SMART criteria. Goals are somewhat placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.	Good Goals are stated well, there is 1 Predisposing, 1 Reinforcing and 1 Enabling goal stated, meets all SMART criteria. Goals are placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.
Input/Output/Process Goals	Poor Goals are not stated as an end result, not positive, doesn't meet most SMART criteria. Goals are inappropriately placed.	Fair Goals are stated appropriately, there are 1 out of 2 goals for one of the following: Input Process and Output Process goals, meets most of the SMART criteria. Goals are somewhat placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.	Good Goals are stated well, there is 1 Input Process and 1 Output Process goal stated, meets all SMART criteria. Goals are placed in the appropriate phase of the PRECEDE/PROCEED model.
Outcome Objectives	Poor Objectives do not relate to the outcome goals, does not meet most SMART criteria, and are inappropriate.	Fair 2 out of 3 outcome objectives are appropriate for the QOL and Health goals and may meet with a some success. Meets all SMART criteria.	Good 2 out of 2 outcome objectives are appropriate for the QOL and Health goals and should meet with a good measure of success. Meets all SMART criteria.
Impact Objectives	Poor Objectives do not relate to the impact goals, does not meet most SMART criteria, and are inappropriate.	Fair 5 out of 10 impact objectives are appropriate for the Behavioral and Environmental goals; and Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling goals and may meet with a some success. Meets all SMART criteria.	Good 10 out of 10 impact objectives are appropriate for the Behavioral and Environmental goals; and Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling goals and should meet with a good measure of success. Meets all SMART criteria.
Process Objectives	Poor Objectives do not relate to the process goals, does not meet most SMART criteria, and are inappropriate.	Fair 2 out of 4 outcome objectives are appropriate for both Input and Output process goals and may meet with a some success. Meets all SMART criteria.	Good 4 out of 4 process objectives are appropriate for both Input and Output process goals and should meet with a good measure of success. Meets all SMART criteria.
Organization	Poor Poorly written, disorganized, hard to follow. Multiple grammar and spelling errors.	Fair Well written, is neat and fairly easy to follow. Few grammar and spelling errors.	Good Very well written and organized, and easy to follow. No grammar and spelling errors.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric