Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation
Developmental Psychology 325 Class Presentation
Student groups will be responsible for thoroughly presenting/teaching the topic to the class in 20 minute period
Rubric Code:
VXX468A
By
trimiros
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Dev.Psych. Presentationn
Group Presentation
Outstabding
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Subject Knowledge
20 pts
5
( x 20 pts)
Students have addressed major facts r/t the cognitive ,physical social emotional aspects of dev stage.Info is accurate, ,relevant.Critical thinking evidenced, applications made
4
( x 20 pts)
Students have addressed many of the cognitive ,physical social emotional aspects of dev stage. Info is relevant and current & certain areas show critical thinking. Appropriate applications made.
3
( x 20 pts)
Students have included some facts regarding cognitive ,physical social emotional developmental stage assigned however may have missed some main areas or covered them inadequately.
There is some understanding of subject but little critical thought. few applications.
2
( x 20 pts)
Students have included inadequate facts regarding the cognitive, physical social emotional aspects of the developmental stage assigned.
Information is inaccurate and shows surface knowledge only.
Delivery Methods and Visuals
20 pts
5
( x 20 pts)
Visual Aids are of superior quality, neat and organized. Variety of style and form is maximized ( art music, color) Visuals effectively aid the listener in understanding the presentation.
4
( x 20 pts)
Visual aids are of high quality. Visuals somewhat varied. Visuals aid the listener in understanding the presentation.
3
( x 20 pts)
Visual aids are not high quality. Not easy to read or comprehend, & are not clearly in sync or linked to the presentation . Aids do not aid in the understanding of the presentation.
2
( x 20 pts)
Presentation lacks visual aids, or they are insufficient. Aids are of poor quality and deter from understanding of the presentation
Comprehensibility of Presentation
20 pts
5
( x 20 pts)
Well structured and presented in a logical sequence. Into, Purpose etc. Students have rehearsed the presentation and are speaking clearly for everyone to hear.
4
( x 20 pts)
Well structured and presented in a fairly logical sequence. Into, Purpose etc. identified
some minor confusion evident. members vary in ability to be heard.
Weight: pts
Move row up
Delete row
Move row down
advanced options
Weight: pts
Move row up
Delete row
Move row down <
3
( x 20 pts)
Somewhat clear but leaves the listener a little lost. Students are not sure of what they are presenting.
2
( x 20 pts)
Unclear and confusing. Not understood by listeners.
Use and Variety of Sources
15 pts
5
( x 15 pts)
Sources of high quality ( scholarly original) and varied. 6/6 quality research articles included. Content relevant & smoothly integrated into discussion. All sources are referenced using APA format.
4
( x 15 pts)
Majority of sources are high quality ( scholarly , original) and varied. 5-6/6 articles included. Content relevant and smoothly integrated into discussion. All sources are referenced using APA format
3
( x 15 pts)
Little variety and 4 or more of sources are not scholarly or from questionable resources. Content not well understood irrelevant or misapplied. All sources are referenced using APA format
2
( x 15 pts)
Unreliable and uncorroborated sources. less than Little or no variety. some may be referenced, but inproperly, or non APA style.
Persuasion/ Context
10 pts
5
( x 10 pts)
Convincingly addresses all areas and accomplishes the purpose of the assignment.
4
( x 10 pts)
Addresses most areas but leaves certain areas not addressed.
3
( x 10 pts)
Only some parts of development are addressed.
2
( x 10 pts)
Unsupported and unconvincing presentation. Purpose of the presentation is not accomplished.
Participation & style
15 pts
5
( x 15 pts)
all members included and participated fully.
4
( x 15 pts)
All members participated fully, however one or more appeared ill at ease, or non confident . Poor eye contact, or fidgeting
3
( x 15 pts)
memebers participated unevenly. One or more appearred nervous and ill prepared, or lacked confidence.
2
( x 15 pts)
not all members were present. Style was disorganized or select members dominated or did not fully participate
Keywords:
Developmental Psychology 325 heritage University Presentation
Subjects:
Psychology
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Psychology rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.