Skip to main content
iRubric: Japan Edo Period Group Project -- McKee rubric

iRubric: Japan Edo Period Group Project -- McKee rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Japan Edo Period Group Project -- McKee 
Rubric Code: VB368A
By teacherlib
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Level 4

(80% - 100%)

0 pts

Level 3

(70% - 79%)

0 pts

Level 2

(60% - 69%)

0 pts

Level 1

(50% - 59%)

(N/A)

Research & Content

Detailed, accurate, & relevant
Level 4

Students provided detailed & accurate information that shows their complete understanding of the topic.
Level 3

Students provided detailed & accurate information that shows their good understanding of the topic.
Level 2

Students provided limited detailed and some inaccurate information that shows their limited understanding of the topic.
Level 1

Students provided limited information related to the topic. Students do not show an understanding of the topic. Some facts are inaccurate.
Slideshow Presentation

Minimal text with high quality pictures.
Make it interesting & informative.
Level 4

The visuals used created a unique and highly effective presentation.
The presentation told a story with an introduction, middle and conclusion that engaged the audience.
All visuals were of high quality.
The text is minimal and easy to read.
Level 3

The visuals used reinforce the content and enhance the presentation.
The presentation told a story that engaged the audience.
The visuals were of good quality.
The text is minimal but a little difficult to read.
Level 2

The visuals used did enhance the presentation. However, the presentation told a confusing story that did not engage the audience.
Most of the visuals were of poor quality.
There was too much text in the slideshow.
The text was difficult to read.
Level 1

The visuals were ineffective and the presentation was confusing for the audience.
All of the visuals were of poor quality.
There was too much text.
The text was unreadable.
Oral Communication Skills

The presenters are more important than the text on the slides.
Level 4

There was a balance between what was typed on the slide and what the students spoke.
The students did not read from notes. Voices were always clear and understandable and had expression.
Level 3

The presentation was dominated by the students reading from the slides rather than a balance between what was typed on the slide and what the students spoke.
The students only occasionally read from notes.
Voices were mostly clear and understandable and had expression.
Level 2

The students mostly read from the text on the slides and added very little additional oral content.
OR
The students read from the text on the slides and mostly read from notes.
Voices were not clear or understandable OR had no expression.
Level 1

The students read from the text on the slides and added no additional content orally.
AND
The students read from notes throughout the presentation. Voices were not clear or understandable AND had no expression.
Written Communication Skills

spelling & grammar on slides & summary handout
Level 4

There are no spelling or grammar mistakes.
Excellent proofreading.
Level 3

There are no more than 2 spelling or grammar mistakes. Some careless proofreading errors are evident.
Level 2

There are no more than 4 spelling or grammar mistakes. Poor proofreading.
Level 1

The spelling & grammar errors make the project difficult to understand.
No evidence of proofreading.
Citations List

for text & images -- use McKee's handout for proper citation format.
Level 4

The location of all pictures and all researched information was cited properly according to McKee's handout.
Level 3

The location of some pictures and some researched information was not cited OR some citations were not in the correct format according to McKee's handout.
Level 2

The location of some pictures and some researched information was not cited AND some citations were not in the correct format according to McKee's handout.
Level 1

The location of most of the pictures and most of the information was not cited OR none of the citations were in the correct format according to McKee's handout.
One-page Written Summary

Level 4

The summary is very good in explaining the research, the key information and ideas of the topic.
Level 3

The summary is good in explaining the research, the key information and ideas of the topic.
Level 2

The summary is weak in explaining the research, the key information and ideas of the topic.
Level 1

The summary is a poor explanation of the research, the key information and ideas of the topic.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98