Skip to main content
iRubric: Theory Review Short Paper Rubric

iRubric: Theory Review Short Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Theory Review Short Paper Rubric 
This rubric is for grading student's final paper.
Rubric Code: V5A39B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Topic Choice

1 point

Poor

- Topic subject does not fit the assignment
Fair

-Topic subject fits the basic requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the theoretical analysis
Good

- Topic subject fits all the requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the interaction of theoretical analysis and performance interpretation
Excellent

- Topic subject fits all the requirements of the assignment
- Topic examines the interaction of theoretical analysis and performance interpretation showing direct application to technique and performance execution
Thesis Development

2 points

Poor

- No Thesis statement
Fair

- Thesis statement exists but is weak
Good

- Thesis statement is clearly stated and covers who, what, when, and where and why type of questions.
Excellent

- Thesis statement is clearly stated, gives organization to the paper structure and addresses the significance of the research. i.e. How - specific examples are given and connected across genre. and Why - considers the larger significance.
Content Areas

2 points

Poor

Major required topics are missing completely or lacking adequate consideration
- Paper is well below required length
Fair

Most required content areas are addressed minimally.
- Paper meets the minimum required length
Good

All required content areas are addressed and supported with documented sources.
- Paper meets the minimum required length while fully addressing each area
- Body content is directly related to thesis
Excellent

All required content areas are addressed and covered in depth using a variety of documented sources.
- Paper meets the required length and ideas are fully developed with clarity and brevity
Documentation

1 point

Poor

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting such as citations, title page, references, page numbers.
Fair

- Paper follows most guidelines.
-Formatting is mostly accurate with most required components.
Good

- Paper follows all guidelines but contains slight errors in citation formatting.
Excellent

- Paper follows designated guidelines with all required components.
Anaylsis

2 points

Poor

-Level One analysis is incomplete or missing.
- Level Two analysis is incomplete or missing.
Fair

- Level One analysis appears on the music.
- Level Two analysis is written out but doesn't add new interpretation to the level one analysis (either too detailed or too sparse).
Good

- Level One analysis appears on the music in detail.
- Level Two analysis is written out showing major structural motion in bass and soprano.
Excellent

- Level Two Analysis shows significant structural moments for interpretation
- Analysis is thorough and clear.
- Analysis highlights important moments in the paper.
- Analysis is incorporated into the body of the paper to show significance.
Organization & Structure

1 point

Poor

- No structure present.
- Paragraphs too long and rambling.
- Information presented in list style without thesis statements and form.
Fair

- Introduction and/or conclusion missing.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Good

- Introduction does not preview all major points.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion does not flow well from the body of paper.
Excellent

- Structure of the paper is clear.
- Introduction previews all major points.
- Paragraph transitions are logical.
- Conclusion flows from the body of paper.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

1 point

Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language is confusing and hard to follow throughout.
- Language syntax is awkward or too informal most of the time.
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language is confusing occasionally.
- Language syntax is awkward or too informal occasionally.
Good

- Paper contains less than 1- 2 errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
- Language is understandable.
- Language syntax is mostly smooth and academic.
Excellent

- Paper contains no errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling.
- Language is clear and precise.
- Language syntax is smooth and academic.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16