Skip to main content
iRubric: Journal Entry Notebook rubric

iRubric: Journal Entry Notebook rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Journal Entry Notebook 
Journal Entry Notebook
Students need to have journal entries for science classes. Have journal entry questions and responses All stray papers must be stapled into journal notebook
Rubric Code: UX658W7
By rvanderah
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Journal Entry
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Title/Objective

Excellent

Has clear title to identify the project. Clearly and accurately stated the objective of the project.
Good

Has title to identify the project but objective should have been clearer or more detailed.
Fair

Title or objective may be unclear or wrongly stated.
Poor

Title or objective is missing.
drawings

Excellent

Initial, final and design changes are all documented with clear drawings. Labels are included where needed to add clarification.
Good

Initial, final designs are documented with clear drawings. They may need clarification to be understood or design changes are missing.
Fair

Drawings are included but not clear as to initial, final or design change. May be missing more than one or the drawings are very difficult to follow or are very basic and sloppy.
Poor

More than one of the drawings is missing or they are such poor quality that they can not be assessed.
Understanding/discussion

Excellent

Responses are accurate, detailed, show depth of understanding of the topic. Reasoning explained on design and material choices. Correct scientific vocabulary used where and when appropriate. Connect what did to the objective. Entry is not the same as others in their group.
Good

Responses are accurate but may lack detail or clarity to show depth of understanding of the topic. Reasoning needs to be explained better on design and material choices. Correct scientific vocabulary used where and when appropriate. Connect what did to the objective.
Fair

Responses may be inaccurate or too brief and lack detail or clarity to show depth of understanding of the topic. Reasoning lacking or too brief, needs to be explained better on design and material choices. May not connect what did to the objective.
Poor

Limited details.
Responses are limited and very general. Doesn't show depth of understanding.
Neatness

Excellent

Entry is neat, easy to follow and legible.
Good

Entry could be better organized or legible.
Fair

Difficult to follow or read.
Poor

Too messy to asses.
Summary

Excellent

Discuss what went well and didn't go well. What changes need to be made to make the project successful if were to do again. Clearly connect final results and any data to the objective.
Good

Discussion of what went well and didn't go well. Needs to be more detailed. What changes need to be made to make the project successful if were to do again. Failed to clearly connect final results and any data to the objective.
Fair

Discussion weak and or too brief. Lacks details. May or may not have included changes needed to be made to make the project successful if were to do again. Connection to objective weak or missing.
Poor

No summary



Keywords:
  • Science journal entry



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16